• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Oldham v Exeter discussion thread

IndoMike

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
34,044
Location
Touring Central Java...
You need to open your eyes up a bit. It's not about playing three centre backs, it's about getting more men in midfield. Getting Matt Jay that little bit of space in between the lines where he can be devastating either in creation or finishing. Compressing their side in the way we do when we're at our best, no time, no space. You might not want to hear stories of certain players being tired but Taylor and Collins have been playing twice a week with break and it's showing, especially in Collins.
Can"t agree with you. Having three at the back takes a player away from a more advanced position. Against a poor team like Oldham there's no reason why Key and Page can't attack at the right time. I trust our two centre backs to be able to handle Oldham's probable one striker
Regarding tiredness, in the old days players didn't get tired, even though they played on much heavier surfaces and had a worse diet and training facilities
If young professional footballers at their physical prime can't handle two matches a week then I don't know why. It is their job, after all. The only caveat to that is that the training must be spot on
Knowing that soon they will be getting their summer break, I would expect all uninjured players to be available and ready for the fight.I have another comment about that but will hold back for a couple of matches to see what happens.
I respect your opinion, Harris : please respect mine
 

grecIAN Harris

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
28,175
Location
Back home in the village
Can"t agree with you. Having three at the back takes a player away from a more advanced position. Against a poor team like Oldham there's no reason why Key and Page can't attack at the right time. I trust our two centre backs to be able to handle Oldham's probable one striker
Regarding tiredness, in the old days players didn't get tired, even though they played on much heavier surfaces and had a worse diet and training facilities
If young professional footballers at their physical prime can't handle two matches a week then I don't know why. It is their job, after all. The only caveat to that is that the training must be spot on
Knowing that soon they will be getting their summer break, I would expect all uninjured players to be available and ready for the fight.I have another comment about that but will hold back for a couple of matches to see what happens.
I respect your opinion, Harris : please respect mine
It's not about respect or lack of. It's about telling you what I'm seeing that quite clearly you're not. I like 4-4-2 but if Oldham are as crap as you think they are why attack with four when you can have five with width and Matt Jay pulling the strings in hard to reach places as far as defending him goes. As for tiredness, I know where your coming from but this season is like no other. You can't tell me that has been a season where teams are playing twice a week virtually all season. It might get like it from the back end of February if the weathers been bad or we've a good cup run or two but I've never seen a season where you're looking for the midweek breaks rather than the midweek games.
More over, have you seen the shape Oldham play with? 3-4-2-1. If you play 3-5-2 against that, we're overloading them up front or Matt Jay gets space if they want to play with a sweeper. If they play with a sweeper, we're overloading the midfield and Matt Jay is still free. As they have no full backs/wing backs there is plenty of space for Key and Sparkes to fill their boots in wide areas. I would imagine with that sort of shape they want to try and play, so as I suggested previously we have a strong on to pressure fast and hard and stop them from doing that
 

IndoMike

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
34,044
Location
Touring Central Java...
It's not about respect or lack of. It's about telling you what I'm seeing that quite clearly you're not. I like 4-4-2 but if Oldham are as crap as you think they are why attack with four when you can have five with width and Matt Jay pulling the strings in hard to reach places as far as defending him goes. As for tiredness, I know where your coming from but this season is like no other. You can't tell me that has been a season where teams are playing twice a week virtually all season. It might get like it from the back end of February if the weathers been bad or we've a good cup run or two but I've never seen a season where you're looking for the midweek breaks rather than the midweek games.
More over, have you seen the shape Oldham play with? 3-4-2-1. If you play 3-5-2 against that, we're overloading them up front or Matt Jay gets space if they want to play with a sweeper. If they play with a sweeper, we're overloading the midfield and Matt Jay is still free. As they have no full backs/wing backs there is plenty of space for Key and Sparkes to fill their boots in wide areas. I would imagine with that sort of shape they want to try and play, so as I suggested previously we have a strong on to pressure fast and hard and stop them from doing that
Opinions about football are just that : opinions. Neither you nor I are football gurus and we don't know the answers to everything. Even professional managers don't even know.
So my opinion is that our defenders are more comfortable playing 4-4-2. If we played 3-5-2 and had a centre back comfortable moving into midfield then that would help, but at the moment we don't.
Regarding the pressing game, you can"t keep that up for a whole game : it has to be at certain moments when 2-3 players swarm over a defender when the defender has been out in a difficult position.
Wherever players are positioned there will be new space created. Obviously playing wingers stretches the opponents, so when you're attacking that's probably a good thing but can also leave yourself wide-open to counter attack if the midfield is stretched out.
The funny thing is there is no way we can know who is right, because we can't play the same game twice simultaneously. We could win 2-0 using 4-4-2 but maybe we could have won 4-0 using 3-5-3.....or vice versa. That's why it's about opinions : it can't be evidence- based
 

Legohead

Banned
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Messages
6,762
It can't be evidence based? You are Boris Johnson and i claim my 5 pounds. :LOL: ;)

The pressing game is when we at our best and most effective but it is not possible to play like this every game. It is just unfortunate that in quite a few games when we haven't played in this aggressive manner we have not managed to grind results out, Newport away being one obvious exception. This is perhaps why we are where we are. Most teams can't live with us when we play like we did against Scunny / Orient etc but it's about grinding out a few positive results when we cannot play with this energy and intensity and we haven't been able to manage that recently.
 

grecIAN Harris

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
28,175
Location
Back home in the village
Opinions about football are just that : opinions. Neither you nor I are football gurus and we don't know the answers to everything. Even professional managers don't even know.
So my opinion is that our defenders are more comfortable playing 4-4-2. If we played 3-5-2 and had a centre back comfortable moving into midfield then that would help, but at the moment we don't.
Regarding the pressing game, you can"t keep that up for a whole game : it has to be at certain moments when 2-3 players swarm over a defender when the defender has been out in a difficult position.
Wherever players are positioned there will be new space created. Obviously playing wingers stretches the opponents, so when you're attacking that's probably a good thing but can also leave yourself wide-open to counter attack if the midfield is stretched out.
The funny thing is there is no way we can know who is right, because we can't play the same game twice simultaneously. We could win 2-0 using 4-4-2 but maybe we could have won 4-0 using 3-5-3.....or vice versa. That's why it's about opinions : it can't be evidence- based
If you can't make your opinions based on evidence then you're just making things up as you go along. The only good things that are made up are fairy tales.
 

IndoMike

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
34,044
Location
Touring Central Java...
If you can't make your opinions based on evidence then you're just making things up as you go along. The only good things that are made up are fairy tales.
So how can you prove to me that if we play 4-4-2, no matter what the result is, it would have been better to have played 3-5-2?
You can't, can you?
What is your evidence to prove you are right? You don't have it. It's just your opinion : if you like, your fairy tale
But isn't that the beauty of football?
There are so many opinions about players, line -ups, the manager, but none of us has been professionals in the world of football. Who knows which one of us is right?
 
Last edited:

grecIAN Harris

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
28,175
Location
Back home in the village
Can"t agree with you. Having three at the back takes a player away from a more advanced position. Against a poor team like Oldham there's no reason why Key and Page can't attack at the right time. I trust our two centre backs to be able to handle Oldham's probable one striker
Regarding tiredness, in the old days players didn't get tired, even though they played on much heavier surfaces and had a worse diet and training facilities
If young professional footballers at their physical prime can't handle two matches a week then I don't know why. It is their job, after all. The only caveat to that is that the training must be spot on
Knowing that soon they will be getting their summer break, I would expect all uninjured players to be available and ready for the fight.I have another comment about that but will hold back for a couple of matches to see what happens.
I respect your opinion, Harris : please respect mine
Well I wasn't far wrong Michael. He just kept Collins in and left Seymour on the bench.
 

StroudGrecian

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
14,014
Location
Never done this before
Looks like he's been on the potcheen 🙂

Sponsored by Domino's :ROFLMAO:
 

IndoMike

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
34,044
Location
Touring Central Java...
Well I wasn't far wrong Michael. He just kept Collins in and left Seymour on the bench.
And? In my team I picked Collins and said no to Seymour.
 

IndoMike

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
34,044
Location
Touring Central Java...
It can't be evidence based? You are Boris Johnson and i claim my 5 pounds. :LOL: ;)

The pressing game is when we at our best and most effective but it is not possible to play like this every game. It is just unfortunate that in quite a few games when we haven't played in this aggressive manner we have not managed to grind results out, Newport away being one obvious exception. This is perhaps why we are where we are. Most teams can't live with us when we play like we did against Scunny / Orient etc but it's about grinding out a few positive results when we cannot play with this energy and intensity and we haven't been able to manage that recently.
Lego, I don't see the connection between what I wrote and what you have written above
 
Top