In fairness to Artur....

[wemissmoxey]

Well, 99.9% of you know. I still don't see Tis as stubborn ... :S

You don't see any of the games either .

 

[Alistair20000]

You don't see any of the games either .

Mystic Rae is all seeing Missy. West Dorset be a weird place.

 

[RaeUK]

I'm not entirely sure how to respond to the last two posts. A little scrying might help perhaps ...

 

[PeteUSA]

We tend not to dwell on Paul Jones' howler against Torquay in the first leg play off semi final, but rather remember the come back in the second leg and the triumph at Wembley.

Thats not a fair comparision. The Paul Jones howler to which you refer was nowhere near as farcical as the Krysiak pantomime. Jonah was at fault but Zebroski was bearing down on him at a rate of knots, and ultimately charged PJ's attempted clearance down. Krysiak, albeit fairly briefly, was in full command of his situation. Instead of aiming the ball into the OG, he decided he'd stop dead, and try to run across the ever nearing forward. Next thing you know, Krysiaks sat on his ass, and the player has as long as he wants to walk the ball into an empty net! No matter what happened in the rest of the game, Artur most definitely cost us that game. The fact that he made one or two noteable saves after that has nothing to do with it.

 

[dommers]

We did actually. Take that mistake out of the game and the result would have been 1-1.

Why choose that mistake rather than Troy and Golbourne's combined effort?

 

[Antony Moxey]

Why choose that mistake rather than Troy and Golbourne's combined effort?

You genuinely can't see why? FFS have a word with yourself.

 

[dommers]

You genuinely can't see why? FFS have a word with yourself.

No. Both mistakes cost us a goal and we lost because they scored one more so why distinguish between them.

 

[Antony Moxey]

No. Both mistakes cost us a goal and we lost because they scored one more so why distinguish between them.

You don't think Krysiak's mistake was a worse one than Troy's? You don't think the striker still had to win the ball against Troy and then beat the keeper afterwards? you genuinely cannot distinguish between Troy's and Krysiak's errors and maintain that because the opposition scored then they must be the same?

Sorry, but if you truly believe that then you're not worth debating with because that's just plain stupidity.

 

[dommers]

You don't think Krysiak's mistake was a worse one than Troy's? You don't think the striker still had to win the ball against Troy and then beat the keeper afterwards? you genuinely cannot distinguish between Troy's and Krysiak's errors and maintain that because the opposition scored then they must be the same?

Krysiak's mistake may have been worse but ultimately the outcome was the same which is all that matters.

 

[Antony Moxey]

Krysiak's mistake may have been worse but ultimately the outcome was the same which is all that matters.

Except that with Troy's mistake there was always the chance Krysiak might have saved it, with Krysiak's mistake there really could only have been one outcome.