It looked like a penalty on the camera angle, but the player didn't time his going down well, it was clearly after the contact. If English refs see that they often don't give it. Ironically they are rewarding good "diving" by giving them when the player simulates better. I'm sure the ref saw the contact. Slight though it was, it was enough to impede the attacking player. The old cliches "on the halfway line it would have been given" or if "it had been a player at home and the fans claim it..." apply for this one. I still haven't seen a decision as bad as the penalty given against Christy Pym at Forest Green which cost us two points and potentially a place in the playoffs, so we're still owed stuff like this anywayI'm going to be in the minority here, but I thought we were lucky not to concede a penalty midway through the second half. The commentators said "there was contact, but their player when down too easily". That was touch and go I know. Other referees like friend Huxtable would have given that!