Extra charge for that oneI'd also like add the their there lesson too.
Could've and should've are fine but surely you should have explained that they are contractions of 'should have' and 'could have' in order to illustrate why 'should of' and 'could of' are wrong?G2K: 1. Could've and should've are contractions, not lazy contractions, unless I am mistaken, which of course is possible.
Tx for your input, SG. Three reasons why I didn't:Could've and should've are fine but surely you should have explained that they are contractions of 'should have' and 'could have' in order to illustrate why 'should of' and 'could of' are wrong?
Fortunately there is a good chance of it being mangled in the fecking tannoy which is not fit for purpose.What about that terrible mangling of the language by the child - broadcast before every match?
And irrelevant and not relevant !I cannot stand tautology - it is superfluous and unnecessary.
Don't be such an (oxy)*****.Is tautology wot teachers learned?
Might want to had they're to that too.I'd also like add the their there lesson too.