Nah, I've had a couple before.Les, that may be your first ever Exeweb whoooosh. Congratulations.
Nah, I've had a couple before.Les, that may be your first ever Exeweb whoooosh. Congratulations.
Well spotted. I have to admit, I did wonder about that! ;-)Do you need the comma after that second 'far'?
Excellent idea.Can we have a lesson on your and you're please next week? It also seems to cause so many people so many problems.
What you're supposed to do at a red light?
G2K: 1. Could've and should've are contractions, not lazy contractions, unless I am mistaken, which of course is possible. 2. Maybe Watson should've been on the bench 3, I won't mention "unnecessary" (don't want to be over-pedanticWhilst I 100% agree with you on this particularly obnoxious irritant, at the risk of being accused of unneccessary linguistic pedantry are you, yourself, not slightly guilty of a lazy contraction of should have and could have here?
Oh, and PS: Watson COULDN'T OF scored today either, as it 'appens. He weren't even on the bench.
Thanks, Swanaldo I take great pride in thatWorse thread ever.
Already : I put him in the remedial classWhere does Creds sign up?