• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

A message for Paul Tisdale

jabba the gut

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
2,988
Location
London/Exeter
..We are a better side than Argyle...
With a fit midfield we are. With a struggling Doherty, no Matt Oakley, no in-form Gow (and not the version who's been a liability at times) and a Molesley who hasn't played much due to his rush of blood at Preston and who's head went yesterday, there's not quite as much in it.

in fact, Banton aside Argyle are a poor side...
That's a bit simplistic. Bhasera's a decent player, Blanchard was playing in League 1 not that long ago and was their player of the year, Branston and Wotton can still do a job at this level, Guerreri has decent ability judging from the game at SJP - although like many of his type in the lower-leagues he can get a bit aimless and flatter to deceieve - and Tyler Harvey is supposedly a highly-rated prospect.

(the league table doesn't lie)...
It can be a little misleading at times though. It's not as if Arg*le have been marooned at the foot of the table, the league is quite tight. They're only actually six points of being smack bang in mid-table and could theoretically finish in the top-half. If you look at their record, they haven't really been hammered that many times. Their main problem has been scoring more than a goal a game, but their defence seems to have been quite good - only three teams have conceded fewer goals (including us). In their last seven games, they've only lost to Gillingham - by a single goal - and have beaten Southend and Fleetwood and drawn away to Bradford, so it seems an awful lot of teams don't "want it" when they play them.

In hindsight it was always unrealistic to expect us to roll over them, or even to be reasonably sure we would win, especially with some big players out or not fully fit. I agree we were depressingly sh*te and they weren't great, but I think we've been a bit fooled as to how bad they really are, partly out of wishful thinking and partly from hearing and reading the usual doom-mongering from their fans that you always get when teams are in their position. In any case, derbies can just be weird sometimes - probably BECAUSE of the pscholgical pressure, rather than because players don't feel it. Paradoxically, nerves and lack of confidence can make some people appear sluggish, lacklustre and unable to get themselves into gear, which can be misinterpreted as laziness. I think Logie suffered from that sometimes.

I think managers get blamed too much sometimes, but I think Fletcher was a big part of their problems. It seemed to me that Fletcher was too inexperienced for the situation he was pitched into - he only did his coaching badges a month or so before he got the job full-time - and was mainly there because Brent wanted a cheap option he could get away with, in a way he couldn't have done without Fletcher having had the respect of the Plymouth fans at the beginning. There was a startling incident between Fletcher and Purse at SJP that demonstrated to me that perhaps Fletcher wasn't in control as much as he should have been.

...yet they looked like world-beaters yesterday...
Is that what they call a world-beating performance these days? A one-nil win at home, with the goal coming from virtually their only dangerous shot on goal, numerous errors (including a comedic free-kick attempt) and where the opposiion dominated the opening 10-15 minutes and could have scored two goals with a bit of luck ? (Admittedly from our only two meaningful situations as well).

Well I'm glad you told me before I made the time to watch the next World cup, because if that's a world-beating performance, then it's going to be a tournament with less quality than Euro 96 - and that's saying something.

You gave us a team on that pitch that was hard to back yesterday.........how is that possible in THE Derby game??????
Are you suggesting that we're the only team that has ever played like sh*te in a derby? Because I would suggest you're very mistaken. In fact I don't recall Ar**le being too clever when we beat them at SJP in league 1. They probably created about two chances, if that.

I ask you, only once, for the rest of your tenure as manager of our club, PLEASE PLEASE send your team out for the Derby games with Argyle knowing what it means to us fans...
He probably knows already. He never said he didn't - he just made the mistake of letting us know what he was really thinking about his approach to motivating the players, correctly implying that there are pros and cons to different options. In hindsight he would have been better off treating us like children and manipulating us with some cynical tub-thumping BS that he knew we wanted to hear, like a lot of managers do. After all, it seems as though most of us have a tendency to behave like Verruca Salt from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory most of the time anyway.

knowing that for this one fixture they need to be prepared to give everything they have, and then a little bit more.
More? Like a hundred-and-ten per cent, eight days a week?

There is no other fixture in the season that is as important...
Speak for yourself.

I'm not saying I wouldn't have been in orbit right now if we'd beaten them - I was literally praying for a week before and even during the game - but if you offered me a win in a game that would get us promotion and being hammered 5-0 by Argyle, I'd take the former and book myself a counsellor for the latter.
 

jabba the gut

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
2,988
Location
London/Exeter
By the way. I'll give you evens on Malcom's next post.
 

jabba the gut

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
2,988
Location
London/Exeter
^^^ hmm. That sounds personal on review. Not meant that way, of course. It's just that, you know, let's at least keep things English English ...
No offence taken Rae. I've seen enough of your posts to know you aren't in the habit of taking teenage sideswipes.

If I ever need to resort to quoting from a dictionary again, I'll be sure to use the OED. Hopefully it won't be necessary though - I'll try and live by the following saying from now on;

"Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience".
 
Last edited:

richard_portland

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
12,977
Location
Backing Gary Caldwell, thanks Matt and good luck.
Crikey Jabba, go to bed chap!:)

The bottom line is we have been poor in derby games this season and as my mates dad, who has been going only this season said, argyle won because they had to. They wanted it more, ok each game is only three points but if the bigger picture is looked at having a good home record and doing well when there is a big away following will boost crowds and revenue.

We may have beaten and drawn with argyle recently but they have been at their lowest ebb, all that is being said is if we had gone out on Saturday and battled for our lives like Plymouth did then anyone criticising would look foolish. As it is it is those who defend the club at all costs who look like that IMO.
 

FAN-TATIC

Active member
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
3,819
Location
Living in the Land of Hope and Optimism.
Jabba, thank you for accumulating the facts and bringing them to the table.

There has been so much hysteria posted on this thread by fans who understandably believe that City v Plymouth is a massive game. It is sad that they do not realise that this view applies solely to the fans.

The management and players are employees of a professional football club. They have an obligation to play 46 League games a season not 2. These employees, like all of us that are employed in other occupations will experience days when nothing seems to go right. We get ****** off when it does, blow our tops for a while but then let it go and get on with what we are employed to do.

I cannot put it as well as you have done, but we share the same view.
 

richard_portland

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
12,977
Location
Backing Gary Caldwell, thanks Matt and good luck.
Give the fans what they want, that would be the clever thing to do. We obviously have no choice to move to the next game but don't expect that to happen until it the Rochdale match begins. It wouldn't be hard to say we understand how important the Plymouth game is before and after a poor performance say that the team let the fans down. Even if they didn't believe it, it gets people onside. If the fans stay away the club suffers so the focus of the club needs to be to stop that happening. What did anyone expect? City not turn up and lose to a poor Plymouth side and exeweb accepts it? Sorry, not going to happen just like it would be the same for any club after a big derby match.

I will be delighted if we bounce back today, but hope there isn't a jibe or two afterwards towards the fan base to prove a point.
 

jabba the gut

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
2,988
Location
London/Exeter
Crikey Jabba, go to bed chap!:)
I suffer from insomnia sometimes due to a chronic health condition. So shoot me.

Can nobody around here debate on the merits of an argument itself, without getting personal?

The bottom line is we have been poor in derby games this season...
Who said we haven't? It's the wild speculation as to the reasons for that which I'm rejecting.

as my mates dad, who has been going only this season said, argyle won because they had to. They wanted it more...
Is your mate's dad an expert in sports psychology? Unless that's the case, then his opinon carries no special weight whatsoever. I'm at a loss to understand why you bothered to bring him into it.

ok each game is only three points but if the bigger picture is looked at having a good home record and doing well when there is a big away following will boost crowds and revenue...
Which is a strawman argument, since I've never disputed that fact, or that we didn't play well.

We may have beaten and drawn with argyle recently but they have been at their lowest ebb, all that is being said is if we had gone out on Saturday and battled for our lives like Plymouth did then anyone criticising would look foolish...
You think they battled for their lives, I think they created feck all, bar the moment of brilliance that won the game, and were helped by the fact we were ****e and timid. The reasons for that are pure speculation on both our parts.

As it is it is those who defend the club at all costs who look (stupid).
And IMO, it's those who look for any stick to beat Tisdale with who look stupid. Especially when they put words into his mouth, nearly always fail to back up their assertions with any evidence and prefer to be duped by hyperbole, a bit of cockerney-cheeky chappy spin and a few old tried and tested chestnuts, like "wanted it more" and "passion" (of which I've seen plenty from Tisdale anyway, sitting where I do) rather than being treated like adults.

If I want to see the variety of manufactured passion, designed to manipulate an audience, that is so beloved by the likes of Match Of The Day pundits and a depressing number of fans, I'll go and watch a porn movie - at least half the cast are better looking. The sort of ridiculously ostentatious displays on a football pitch or interview room that the feeble-minded can't seem to get enough of, leave me cold.

I still shudder at the weekly spectacle of Stuart Pearce running up and down the touchline, doing his weekly impersonation of a cross between an epileptic and somebody suffering from St. Vitus' dance, during his stint as the manager of Manchester City. It was regularly featured in a little five minute compilation, set to Hansen and co fawning over "Pearcey's" good old-fashioned tub-thumping displays of "English Heart".

..."Och, have ye evuh seen enehthung like it in yiur life? It's a pehfawmunce initsel'!... Whit PASHUN!"

Didn't stop Pearce being sh*te though.

And he doesn't do it anymore. Funny that.
 

jabba the gut

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
2,988
Location
London/Exeter
By the way Richard, what's your position on Sheridan's unequivocal statement that he was going to treat the game against us "just like any other game" and not as anything special? Doesn't the the mass hysteria at Tisdale merely having thought aloud about whether he was going to copy Sheridan's approach or not look stupid now? As far as I'm aware Tisdale actually never came down on one side or the other in public anyway - in which case it's entirely possible that he DID treat it as a special game, but that it simply didn't work.
 

Grecian1966

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
1,446
It's true that it's our league position that really counts, look at where we'd be if we got just half of the points on offer from the Rovers, Torquay or Plymouth matches.

Our inability to rise to the occasion has hindered our chances at promotion.
Nail on head. With four winnable games and 12 points at stake that is why the Derby games are vital to our chances of promotion. Local pride is great but the points matter and a return of 2 from 12 is hardly a help.
 

richard_portland

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
12,977
Location
Backing Gary Caldwell, thanks Matt and good luck.
By the way Richard, what's your position on Sheridan's unequivocal statement that he was going to treat the game against us "just like any other game" and not as anything special? Doesn't the the mass hysteria at Tisdale merely having thought aloud about whether he was going to copy Sheridan's approach or not look stupid now? As far as I'm aware Tisdale actually never came down on one side or the other in public anyway - in which case it's entirely possible that he DID treat it as a special game, but that it simply didn't work.
To be honest it doesn't really matter what is said in the grand scheme of things, but I think that when the performance is poor you have to expect criticism. Any manager can say what he likes and set up any way he wants and get away with it if it is successful.
 
Top