Thank youThe majority shareholder would clearly only sell if it thought the future could be brighter for Exeter City with a new form of ownership. In terms of influence, I would argue strongly that the fans should be represented on any board. I have always been of the view that any owner of a football club is essentially a custodian on behalf of the fans. That's why I talk about the people of Exeter. They are Exeter City in my view.
1) So the thousands of Argyle, Torquay, Bristol City, Liverpool, Man Utd and Exeter Chiefs fans living in Exeter get a vote but not the Yorkshire or Norwegian Grecians?
2) I thought the thrust of your argument was that ECFC wasn't commercial enough (village fete I remember). So how does that fit with the idea of an 'owner being a custodian on behalf of the fans'. If that's what you want, then how about an owner who is er, appointed by significant group of fans - to which the only barrier to join is £24
3) You still haven't set out who Option B is. If not a specific name, a 'concept' would do for a start.