Your report is well-written and an interesting analysis of the game.Cheers Terry.
So if for your fans Tisdale will be judged at the end of the season, what is success/failure? Based on some of the signings you made in the summer I wouldn't have thought your squad should be too far off top 7.
Our left side is often our weakness - both our left backs are slow, and we don't really have a left wingback or defensively minded left sided midfielder. This sometimes leads us to being caught out. Moore-Taylor ideally should be left CB not LB. Holmes, Alex Nicholls and Ryan Harley are all good players, but none of them are really suited to the left DM role. Harley did a good job there in our win at Pompey but he'd be wasted there in most games, as Saturday shows, and does tend to drift sometimes. Nicholls does track back, but isn't great positionally.With signings like Holmes and Olejnik I get the sense the club is aiming for more than just staying in the league. Was impressed with Holmes against Stanley, reckon you've missed him when he's been out?
this is what we want!!tisdale/ tiswas are one of the same, both came from 80's had no dress sense and not a clue what's going on. The only difference is tiswas was sacked while tisdale is unsackable due to his pathetic contract that suites no one except for tisdale!
I'm not being funny but I really don't understand that first sentence. Do you mean I shouldn't have any problem believing that (clearly I believe it)? Do you mean I should question it as a fact (they employ Reuben Reid and a few others that wouldn't be at the club if they paid what we do)?Antman, have no problem believing Plymouth should have a higher budget as they get bigger gates. They have however been recovering from big financial issues which they nearly didn't survive. .
No I mean that I think it's likely they have a bigger budget due to better gates, but we know about their financial trouble so I would expect Brent is more careful about things than some owners. I was taking issue with the bit that said they have a budget we can only dream of, do you know roughly how much more than spend on wages? As we have more players as well I would question if the difference is huge or not. I guess things like this we are unlikely to know for sure.I'm not being funny but I really don't understand that first sentence. Do you mean I shouldn't have any problem believing that (clearly I believe it)? Do you mean I should question it as a fact (they employ Reuben Reid and a few others that wouldn't be at the club if they paid what we do)?