The Drinkers and the Thinkers.

[DJH2005]

I somewhat suspect it isn't. [Awaiting further 'proof'] ...

I would have agreed with you, until I read Lammers post...

 

[RaeUK]

Having checked back a couple of pages...

I'd normally support LLL. However, he popped in, dropped a wee bombshell and then failed to follow through. So I'm left not knowing quite what strand to believe...

 

[wemissmoxey]

Having checked back a couple of pages...

I'd normally support LLL. However, he popped in, dropped a wee bombshell and then failed to follow through. So I'm left not knowing quite what strand to believe...

Too many bog standard links for my liking !

 

[RaeUK]

I'll drink to that, WMM ...

 

[Snakebite]

Having checked back a couple of pages...

I'd normally support LLL. However, he popped in, dropped a wee bombshell and then failed to follow through. So I'm left not knowing quite what strand to believe...

Quelle surprise, it's his trademark move.

"I know something you don't know, so here's a snippet of info and I shall now bugger off back into the darkness".

 

[Antony Moxey]

Quelle surprise, it's his trademark move.

"I know something you don't know, so here's a cryptic snippet of info and I shall now bugger off back into the darkness".

Corrected that for you Snakey.

 

[Snakebite]

Thanks Ant, I shall appoint you my head proof reader!

 

[LammieLammieLammie]

Quelle surprise, it's his trademark move.

"I know something you don't know, so here's a snippet of info and I shall now bugger off back into the darkness".

Not at all, all i have said is that I wouldn't have dismissed that particular rumour as quickly as Hants did. The poster said he'd heard a rumour that some players were in the new inn on a Friday, and a couple of them were drunk. The only people that know whether it's true are not are ones that were there. I wasn't there so can't provide proof.