• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Lord Triesman's comments

angelic upstart

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jul 8, 2004
Messages
27,566
What he said was either a very bad joke or some kind of deep seated paranoia. Or an insight into the level of corruption in the game.

Either way he shouldn't have said it and it he had to go. I just cannot see the motivation of an English newspaper which purports to support the bid publishing something so damaging to that bid.
I think the insight into corruption is the best bet.

Is it possible, that by getting rid of Triesman and getting in someone else may actually help the bid? I mean Triesman might be squeaky clean and if we got Kenneth Noye or someone in, we might be able to offer more than the Spanish and the Russians :)
 

Jason H

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
36,850
Location
Hounslow, Middlesex
Or is this indignation simply an excuse to get at the Daily Mail?

If you are a person in a high-profile position, it is imperative that you don't say stupid things in front of (or even in earshot of) people you don't necessarily know and trust. Walls have ears. Ask Glenn Hoddle, Lawrence Dallaglio, those Newcastle Chairman chappies, John Higgins, that chap wot was Prime Minister, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

One has to wonder why he said this in the first place. Was it something he meant genuinely - "no smoke without fire" etc? Or was he just being plain stupid?

I'm with AU anyway, I don't think this will necessarily harm England's bid. It'll all come down to who has the biggest brown envelopes as usual.
 

angelic upstart

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jul 8, 2004
Messages
27,566
A rare treat for us to agree :) It is also worth noting that Triesman was in a restaurant when he was saying this, I am doubting he was in a private room, so in theory, anyone in their may overhear things.
 

Phil Sayers

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
10,746
Location
Kernow - battering a drunken Octopus
Or is this indignation simply an excuse to get at the Daily Mail?
That's certainly an added bonus! :D

"You can shove your Oswald Mosley up your arse...."
 

antman

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
8,705
Location
Lisbon
Just to go back to the comments, he was clearly just running through various secondhand consipiracy theories without backing. The suggestion that Spain are getting to refs at the World Cup is laughable, they don't need to do that to get through their group and they don't know who'll ref their matches after that. Otherwise, he's just suggesting certain nations will favour others in thier respective bids, which is comlpetely normal.
 

finetime

Active member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
2,395
Location
South East
I think the insight into corruption is the best bet.

Is it possible, that by getting rid of Triesman and getting in someone else may actually help the bid? I mean Triesman might be squeaky clean and if we got Kenneth Noye or someone in, we might be able to offer more than the Spanish and the Russians :)
I don't think any allegation of corruption in sport is *laughable* when there have been so many cases in the past across a range of sports (and countries).
 

elginCity

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jul 29, 2004
Messages
13,003
Location
Swindon
What motivation caused the floozie to approach a paper and then get wired up in the first place?

"Can you just go over that pillow talk from the other night again please Triesie Wiesie, I vaguely remember it was something really, really interesting about Refs, World Cups, Spain and Russia, just speak a little slower and more clearly this time please?"
 

11thFoot

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
45
Location
Far from the Madding crowd
Daily Mail's World Cup Chart

Well the Daily Mail tops the most stupid League. I'm not saying its scuppered our chances, but I doubt if its helped. If you have a major tournament in you country it improves the interest of the game and that could help City and in particular through sponsorship. Its bad enough having Blatter and Plattini with a say without the Daily Stupid sticking its oar in.
 

Cravat

Active member
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
1,654
Re: Daily Mail's World Cup Chart

The Daily Mail remains a horrible reactionary newspaper for cretins.
 

angelic upstart

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jul 8, 2004
Messages
27,566
What motivation caused the floozie to approach a paper and then get wired up in the first place?

"Can you just go over that pillow talk from the other night again please Triesie Wiesie, I vaguely remember it was something really, really interesting about Refs, World Cups, Spain and Russia, just speak a little slower and more clearly this time please?"
I reckon it was planned to be a simple kiss n tell. Instead Triesman gives it the Barry and they get a real story.
 
Top