angelic upstart
Very well known Exeweb poster
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2004
- Messages
- 27,566
I think the insight into corruption is the best bet.What he said was either a very bad joke or some kind of deep seated paranoia. Or an insight into the level of corruption in the game.
Either way he shouldn't have said it and it he had to go. I just cannot see the motivation of an English newspaper which purports to support the bid publishing something so damaging to that bid.
Is it possible, that by getting rid of Triesman and getting in someone else may actually help the bid? I mean Triesman might be squeaky clean and if we got Kenneth Noye or someone in, we might be able to offer more than the Spanish and the Russians