• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Caldwell out?

Gary Caldwell as our manager

  • In

    Votes: 229 59.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 153 40.1%

  • Total voters
    382

edwin_price

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
6,456
Sacking Caldwell would have set us back ten years. Probably would have got Kev Nicholson in until that fell apart. Some failure would eventually have been elected, the fan base would still be divided, we'd be in league 2 next season. The Trust would be declared weak and ineffective, City would go back to being a bottom end league team.
Oooh, front line of Ollie Watkins and Jamie Reid. Matt Grimes pulling the strings. Wheeler out wide. Don't threaten us with a good time.
 

AndyR

Active member
Joined
May 3, 2004
Messages
1,305
Location
Exmouth
I still would have preferred us to go for less of a manager off the merry-go-round and more of an up and coming coach, that'll be for next time. So the middle bit was never my argument anyway as there would be good coaches out there, in the Prem academies etc all year round.
Crikey when you get to my age, 41 (Gary Caldwell's age) does seem "up and coming" :LOL: Better email Matt Taylor and tell him he's past it.....
 

Bridgy 81

Active member
Joined
Jun 9, 2021
Messages
4,531
Location
Bridgwater
Yes we're doing OK. Doing OK is a lot more enjoyable than doing REALLY badly. But it's not great.
I agree with you, until the last bit.
I think this is great.
Mid-table and looking upwards in the third tier - that’s the business as far as I’m (and history) is concerned.
But there’s no reason why (within reason) we can’t hope for more.
 

STURTZ

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
28,445
Location
Je suis Larry
In your opinion. There’s not a single fact in any of that.
Absolute tosh, I've been into the future and can verify everything.
 

denzel

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
14,283
Location
The Travel Tavern
"We were really depleted and had to dig in as a football club, and that includes the board, staff and players sticking together,"

Pointedly omitted the fans.

The issue for me is … when the board, staff and players are all clearly pulling together to get us out of a rut, and it was clear, what makes some ‘supporters’ think they know better ? It’s arrogance !
Easy to say in hindsight, but there did appear to be occasions when the players weren't pulling together. In the dark days of November it looked like a few of them didn't want to be here, maybe Scott never did, and Aimson had that stupid sending off; not sure that Hartridge and Kite are fully committed even now.
 

edwin_price

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
6,456
The issue for me is … when the board, staff and players are all clearly pulling together to get us out of a rut, and it was clear, what makes some ‘supporters’ think they know better ? It’s arrogance !
You want to bin the trust model then?
 

SaintJames

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
5,261
I agree with you, until the last bit.
I think this is great.
Mid-table and looking upwards in the third tier - that’s the business as far as I’m (and history) is concerned.
But there’s no reason why (within reason) we can’t hope for more.
You are right imo although I accept expectations are subjective. History of course isn't subjective in terms of where we have largely played our football. Apart from our first promotion to the third tier I have watched our club in every other season try to compete in the third division. My overwhelming feeling when watching us play in L1 was almost that we were unequal partners struggling to keep our heads afloat. However, at Barnsley, Bristol Rovers and at Wigan it has felt like we have turned a corner. Yes it's a small fragment to base my view on but I feel we are now at least competing as equals. Baby steps I accept but for us to be a truly sustainable league one club we also need a manager who knows how to compete at this level and in Caldwell I think we can. I accept my view wont align with a number on here but my gut feel is that yes we can hope for more
 

Average Joe

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
1,134
Location
England
You want to bin the trust model then?
Wow! What a question.

I absolutely love our trust, and the way its kept our club in shape so us fans can enjoy watching league football, I'll forever be appreciative and I'll ensure my children also appreciate our trust.

But I do think it's time to look for an investor/owner. This will allow more backing.
 

STURTZ

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
28,445
Location
Je suis Larry
Wow! What a question.

I absolutely love our trust, and the way its kept our club in shape so us fans can enjoy watching league football, I'll forever be appreciative and I'll ensure my children also appreciate our trust.

But I do think it's time to look for an investor/owner. This will allow more backing.
Here we go again!😖
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2024
Messages
238
Sacking Caldwell would have set us back ten years. Probably would have got Kev Nicholson in until that fell apart. Some failure would eventually have been elected, the fan base would still be divided, we'd be in league 2 next season. The Trust would be declared weak and ineffective, City would go back to being a bottom end league team.
There is one huge down side…it means we will Never ever, ever Sack a manager ever again now so results for a manager e.g after Caldwell are effectively irrelevant from now on ….which actually to me makes it look weak.
 
Top