Pmc grecian
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2022
- Messages
- 248
I wonder if there is a sell on clause ?
£900k, lovely stuff that’s good business and inflated price once again from PeterboroughGrecianpasty suggesting £900k on the Summer Transfer Thread.
Definitely. A tribunal would have added one.I wonder if there is a sell on clause ?
Well 11 goals in 50 games ( about 1 in 5) compared to the 1 in 3 (32 in 97) for us was less than they expected I would imagine. Probably why they moved him on so quickly to Rovers when it was just 4 in 94!Tommy Nichs didn't start out too badly there, then he got injured.........
It didn’t go to a tribunal so we don’t know if there was a sell on clauseDefinitely. A tribunal would have added one.
That's why I said started out because, IIRC, most of those goals came before the injury.Well 11 goals in 50 games ( about 1 in 5) compared to the 1 in 3 (32 in 97) for us was less than they expected I would imagine. Probably why they moved him on so quickly to Rovers when it was just 4 in 94!
I think the point being that if one wasn’t added, we’d take it tribunalIt didn’t go to a tribunal so we don’t know if there was a sell on clause
The fee is obviously under what the Tribunal would have given us otherwise they would have gone down that route surely. There must be a formula for players from the academy that is more generous than any of us know about. Hence supposedly turning down the two offers from Swansea for Josh. That's why I don't think he'll go down the A38. I can't see them splashing out that sort of money.£900k, lovely stuff that’s good business and inflated price once again from Peterborough
We continue to mug them off