• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Jack Arthur

Hants_red

Admin
Staff member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
62,673
Location
League 1
I see he's in goal for Bideford this afternoon. Hadn't seen anything about a loan.
 

andrew p long

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
12,780
Location
Hagley, Stourbridge
I see he's in goal for Bideford this afternoon. Hadn't seen anything about a loan.
Good to hear. Let's hope he gets plenty of experience of men's football. As one of the articles re Jokull said, its very difficult for keepers to find appropriate loan experience.
 

Rosencrantz

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
10,347
Location
Tiverton
The more men's football Jack gets the better.
 

andrew p long

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
12,780
Location
Hagley, Stourbridge
and keeps a clean sheet in a 1-0 win!
 

SEA Grecian

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Oct 14, 2018
Messages
6,199
Good to hear. Let's hope he gets plenty of experience of men's football. As one of the articles re Jokull said, its very difficult for keepers to find appropriate loan experience.
Totally agree. It shows the benefit of signing an experienced keeper who is happy to sit on the bench. It also explains Matt Taylor’s comments yesterday about the next few weeks being a big opportunity for Harry Lee as it looks like he’ll be playing a lot during the pre-season friendlies, at least until we sign another keeper.
 

Number13

Active member
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
1,875
If we accept that before the first league game we will sign a No1 (Jokull maybe? Archie Mair maybe?) and that Harry Lee will sit on the bench with Scott Brown as cover for both, where is Jack Arthur's future and why did we sign him? Shouldnt it have been Lee or Arthur?
 

Rosencrantz

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
10,347
Location
Tiverton
If we accept that before the first league game we will sign a No1 (Jokull maybe? Archie Mair maybe?) and that Harry Lee will sit on the bench with Scott Brown as cover for both, where is Jack Arthur's future and why did we sign him? Shouldnt it have been Lee or Arthur?
Maybe we are thinking further ahead than just next season?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ash

Hants_red

Admin
Staff member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
62,673
Location
League 1
Lee is 16, while Arthur is 18.
 

fred binneys head

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
22,288
Location
Loving the boy Stanno
Maybe we are thinking further ahead than just next season?
Agreed, and we should do too, for all positions but particularly GK. Having a 16 year old as your first choice first team keeper would be a disaster for the team and for the player.
 

Martin Lawrence

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
5,205
Location
Whipton
Agreed, and we should do too, for all positions but particularly GK. Having a 16 year old as your first choice first team keeper would be a disaster for the team and for the player.
It might be a disaster, but then again, it might not!
 
Top