That simply is not true. There is no way he's subjected to the same level abuse when he plays at Yeovil/Dagenham/York etc etc as he's subjected to at SJP.I suggest (before making such claims) that you have a read of other forums (pasoti inc) and see with your own eyes he gets the same level of abuse everywhere he plays
This did cross my mind yesterday.And id say the reason for Ollies first goal getting past him was down to the pressure of 4k behind him on his back, so on a footballing front we won down to the fans getting at him (no different to the keeper at crawley last monday)
So the next question is, would you rather lose 1 nil to that lot and have a ground that doesnt abuse him, or 3 pts (in the way we pulled them off) with chants aimed at him?
Perhaps the pressure did get to him, but according to Pasoti he's been on poor form for quite some time (http://www.pasoti.co.uk/talk/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=93350), so perhaps it was just a continuation of that. We'll never know either way. He has played in a fair number of games against us before and it's never affected him previously, he usually plays very well against us.
So yes, I'm glad he made the mistake, but no I don't think the end justifies the means re the abuse, mainly because there's no way of being certain the two are connected.