Red Devon
Very well known Exeweb poster
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 11,105
The latest word is that Tottenham are lining up a £20million bid for Watkins
Since when has capacity been the benchmark? Does Premiership ready = size of the stadium capacity? Nope!Is a capacity of 17,500 really 'Premiership ready'? Doesn't seem much bigger (in capacity) to what they have now.
Looks like..? For an outsider looking in, that would be rational and logical conclusion to come up with, so I don't really blame you for holding that view. Plenty of our own fans have come up with the same conclusion.Brentford now 2 points above the relegation zone and sinking like a stone since their manager Smith left. Looks like he was the key to their success.
Really hope that the Bees don't get relegated to Div 1 thus devaluing any possible transfer fee for our asset./QUOTE]
Ummm....!
It can't be ruled out I'm afraid. The Championship is a ruthless division and no side has any god given right to be any good.
Personally, I don't think it will happen, but an awful lot depends on what players leave and stay in January. If anyone offered us £15-20m in January for Watkins I suspect he'll be gone, but I'm not sure anyone will, his form has been quite up and down recently. His big toe injury clearly hasn't helped and it's taking him time to get back up to full capacity. It hasn't helped that he's coming back into a side with a lack of belief and confidence either after having suffered a pretty poor run of results.
What his variable performances do show I think is just how tough the championship is as a division and how good some of the sides are that are in it.
It really must question mark his ability to be able to step up to a higher level.
As you say, my conclusion is shared by many : a successful, bedded in manager probably popular with the players leaves and the new guy comes in. That is not a criticism of the new guy, who clearly will need time to make his mark - it's more like praise for Smith for the good work he did at Brentford. I didn't know that the run of bad results had already started with Smith and would be grateful if you could provide me with the stats. If you're right, might that also have been related to the rumours about Smith leaving for Villa a few weeks bEfore he did actually leave, thus unsettling the team a little?Looks like..? For an outsider looking in, that would be rational and logical conclusion to come up with, so I don't really blame you for holding that view. Plenty of our own fans have come up with the same conclusion.
It is however, respectfully, wrong. The reasons for why (it's wrong) are lengthy and convoluted and I don't think you'd thank me for going into it in depth in a thread about Ollie Watkins, so I won't. But what I will say is, that that bad run started under Smith and simply continued under Frank, it could just as easily have happened with Smith there. A combination of injuries to key players, bad luck, kamikaze defending, silly defensive errors and 'teams working out how to beat us, and us not adapting to that' conspired to produce a pretty poor run of form.
Bear in mind our owners a gambler, the side was built (with a limited budget and minimal squad depth) to play expansive, attacking football and score goals. Take out 3 or 4 key members of the midfield/front 3 through injury (Watkins was one of the injured!), add in stupid and silly defensive mistakes and sides putting 10 men behind the ball after nicking goals through set pieces can produce a pretty poor run of results and that's what happened.
Very little of it has anything to do with Thomas Frank's managerial ability.
On the bench.For anyone with Sky Sports, Brentford’s game live on Sky Sports football this afternoon on the red button
Do you think that significant, LLB?On the bench.