Sexton Blake
Well-known Exeweb poster
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2011
- Messages
- 8,867
Three new signings scoring on their first league appearance for City not sure but I think very unlikely that this has happened before!!?
Positivity was the name of the game today and I did not see us knocking it around at the back. The tactic was to move and pass the ball forward quickly and as for comparing Nicky Law with Harley they are as different as chalk and cheese. Law is combatative with a decent turn of speed and definitely a class above this league.I'm probably going to get shot to pieces for this but I didn't see that much difference between a good performance today and good performance under Tisdale. The build up play was similar, knock it around until and until the gaps were created or knock it long into Stockley. The only noticeable difference was that it was done quicker and with conviction and that we now have a bit of pace up top to be able capitalise on the spaces created but if you take like for like as much as you can get it, versus Carlisle today against Carlisle in the play-offs at home or if you want something more recent Lincoln last season (apart from the obvious differences in personnel), spot the difference. I can almost guarantee that if Tis was still here and played Laws where did (pretty much the same way he was deploying Harley, playing inside left rather than wide on the left with licence to float a bit),people would be on here absolutely slating Tis for it. I can imagine Laws, like Harley, is probably more effective in a central role. We played plenty of long balls into Stockley today, last years management getting slated for it not a word muttered today. The only difference being we had some pace Stockley to work off of him. After 70 minutes we dropped back and held much like were doing under Tis. Some will point to the heat as the reason for this. It might be a valid point but we've got nothing to compare it against and last season it was total scandal to do this.
Let's not beat about the bush, we were good today but we should have had the game wrapped up by half time (that's a phrase that sounds familiar to last season) but found ourselves inviting unnecersery pressure for the last twenty minutes.
Considering our third goal I cannot imagine Harley winning the ball in his own half, sprinting forward, playing the ball one side of the defender and running the other side before passing to StockleyI'm probably going to get shot to pieces for this but I didn't see that much difference between a good performance today and good performance under Tisdale. The build up play was similar, knock it around until and until the gaps were created or knock it long into Stockley. The only noticeable difference was that it was done quicker and with conviction and that we now have a bit of pace up top to be able capitalise on the spaces created but if you take like for like as much as you can get it, versus Carlisle today against Carlisle in the play-offs at home or if you want something more recent Lincoln last season (apart from the obvious differences in personnel), spot the difference. I can almost guarantee that if Tis was still here and played Laws where did (pretty much the same way he was deploying Harley, playing inside left rather than wide on the left with licence to float a bit),people would be on here absolutely slating Tis for it. I can imagine Laws, like Harley, is probably more effective in a central role. We played plenty of long balls into Stockley today, last years management getting slated for it not a word muttered today. The only difference being we had some pace Stockley to work off of him. After 70 minutes we dropped back and held much like were doing under Tis. Some will point to the heat as the reason for this. It might be a valid point but we've got nothing to compare it against and last season it was total scandal to do this.
Let's not beat about the bush, we were good today but we should have had the game wrapped up by half time (that's a phrase that sounds familiar to last season) but found ourselves inviting unnecersery pressure for the last twenty minutes.
PS in a nutshell.Considering our third goal I cannot imagine Harley winning the ball in his own half, sprinting forward, playing the ball one side of the defender and running the other side before passing to Stockley
No pleasing some people.Disappointed that there were no youth players on display.
Everyone's entitled to their opinion and its always interesting to see others take on a game, that said Botaeng had more freedom, competed more passes than any game before, Law offered an attacking mobile threat we've not had before, Fonte showed we have potential of another strong forward.I'm probably going to get shot to pieces for this but I didn't see that much difference between a good performance today and good performance under Tisdale. The build up play was similar, knock it around until and until the gaps were created or knock it long into Stockley. The only noticeable difference was that it was done quicker and with conviction and that we now have a bit of pace up top to be able capitalise on the spaces created but if you take like for like as much as you can get it, versus Carlisle today against Carlisle in the play-offs at home or if you want something more recent Lincoln last season (apart from the obvious differences in personnel), spot the difference. I can almost guarantee that if Tis was still here and played Laws where did (pretty much the same way he was deploying Harley, playing inside left rather than wide on the left with licence to float a bit),people would be on here absolutely slating Tis for it. I can imagine Laws, like Harley, is probably more effective in a central role. We played plenty of long balls into Stockley today, last years management getting slated for it not a word muttered today. The only difference being we had some pace Stockley to work off of him. After 70 minutes we dropped back and held much like were doing under Tis. Some will point to the heat as the reason for this. It might be a valid point but we've got nothing to compare it against and last season it was total scandal to do this.
Let's not beat about the bush, we were good today but we should have had the game wrapped up by half time (that's a phrase that sounds familiar to last season) but found ourselves inviting unnecersery pressure for the last twenty minutes.
So MT's now The Chalk?... but his style of play and MT’s are as different as chalk and cheese. ...
Jay came on im sure Stu Edited oops no it was tillson lol **** im going blind in my old age !OK, thought Sparked and Jay would get a run out.