Alistair20000
Very well known Exeweb poster
Indeed, or should "Michael" have been repositioned between "think" and "there" ? With even more commas ? :S.......one little comma can make so much difference.
Indeed, or should "Michael" have been repositioned between "think" and "there" ? With even more commas ? :S.......one little comma can make so much difference.
It's not a spat, it's a discussion. This is a discussion forum.Leaving aside your spat with Ant (I was wondering if we needed to send a gunboat ) do you think there are any circumstances in which a Referendum should be called Michael ?
Well you did ask...OK. That's clear enough..
Just to add, Ali, why couldn't Cameron have said that the referendum was non- binding? Why did the referendum have to be final? If he had done that, he could have gone back to Brussels with some evidence that the Brits were not at all happy and tried to push for better terms.Indeed, or should "Michael" have been repositioned between "think" and "there" ? With even more commas ? :S
But surely this is the case every time there's a vote for a change. At the next general election do we stick with what we know or go into uncharted territory with Labour? At the Scottish referendum do they stick with Britain go alone where no-one knows what will happen?.
But anyway, Alistair, how can we expect the public to make an educated evaluation of the EU issue and consequences when so many experts were not even sure how things could turn out. How can you vote for something when you have no real idea what the consequences will be.l Now, if the referendum was considered to be a kind of non- binding opinion poll to get a rough idea of how society was thinking, then for me no problem.
That's what I thought. Don't forget Alistair is from Tedburn St. Mary.It's not a spat, it's a discussion. This is a discussion forum.
The Man From Del Monte.As for a non-binding opinion poll, it is, isn't it? I don't think we have any legal obligation to follow it through do we (happy to be corrected on that one though)?
You're right regarding your last paragraph, but Cameron made it binding. He needs a better dictionary. Your first paragraph : when we vote for a government we know we can vote them out 5 years later if they screw up. If we're out of the EU, however, it's forever..But surely this is the case every time there's a vote for a change. At the next general election do we stick with what we know or go into uncharted territory with Labour? At the Scottish referendum do they stick with Britain go alone where no-one knows what will happen?
As for a non-binding opinion poll, it is, isn't it? I don't think we have any legal obligation to follow it through do we (happy to be corrected on that one though)?
He made it binding? By law? I'm not sure he has the power to do that, especially as he's now off to earn a fortune on the lucrative after dinner speaker circuit. What if the next PM says b*ll*cks to what Cameron said, we're staying in? Also, if we do leave, what's to stop us applying to rejoin?You're right regarding your last paragraph, but Cameron made it binding. He needs a better dictionary. Your first paragraph : when we vote for a government we know we can vote them out 5 years later if they screw up. If we're out of the EU, however, it's forever..