STURTZ
Very well known Exeweb poster
So did Tisdale sign Brennan for MK as an injured player? Seems to be a theme there.
I don't know the procedure for triggering the tribunal, but if it's down to us to refer a case to tribunal, maybe we can also withdraw that referral. So I suppose if that's true, maybe we could have said give us Dickenson and we'll and we'll stop the tribunal? A lot of guesswork here he but if things can happen this way, there could be some truth to the rumours.Can they do that ? I'd have thought that the final part of the Hiram saga would be the price put on the deal by the tribunal and the Dickensen move is completely separate. The one would have no impact on the other. Therefore I reckon the numpties at MK are talking total buttocks.
That doesn’t make sense, though, as MK cancelled his contract which would seem to suggest we signed an out-of-contract player and, technically at least, didn’t deal directly with MK.Interestingly on the MK Dons fans forum there’s a few suggesting that this free transfer is a replacement to any money still owed to us for Hiram Boateng.
Think it was due to Boateng being under 24 at the time and us offering him somethingI don't get why MK owe us anything for Boetang as surely he was a player out of contract? He was not a youth player of ours, was he? Can someone kindly explain when a club would take loosing player to a tribunal to me please?
Correct, more details here.Think it was due to Boateng being under 24 at the time and us offering him something