Colesman Ballz
Very well known Exeweb poster
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
- Messages
- 15,237
Yes, but in a slightly more convoluted way !Stockley?
Yes, but in a slightly more convoluted way !Stockley?
Stansfield, RandallYes, but in a slightly more convoluted way !
Stansfield didn't go for "Big Money", Fulham snapped him up for £100k ish, and Joel isn't a striker per se, we played him out wide and Posh are using him in midfield, but nonetheless he was a very "good earner" for us !Stansfield, Randall
Who've Cheltenham put out and for what values? I doubt they've got more then us over the last decade for the sale of strikers. 750K for Stockley, we must've got decent money for Stansfield, even. 7 figures for Watkins and Nombe, Tom Nichols. You could argue that Randall fits loosely into the "forward" category... Not bad going.Eh ? I'll give you Ollie, and maybe Sam but after that it'sTom Nichols at £300k and then you are down to Matt Jay and the lad we sold to Truro for £10k. The Club that have really turned them out consistently over the last 50 years is Bristol Rovers.
If I remember correctly the only thing said about Stansfield’s transfer to Fulham was that it had been conducted amicably and the fee was, of couse, undisclosed. It might have been a few thousand or it might have add-ons potentially worth millions. We just don’t know.Stansfield didn't go for "Big Money", Fulham snapped him up for £100k ish, and Joel isn't a striker per se, we played him out wide and Posh are using him in midfield, but nonetheless he was a very "good earner" for us !
This is what the Club actually said.If I remember correctly the only thing said about Stansfield’s transfer to Fulham was that it had been conducted amicably and the fee was, of couse, undisclosed. It might have been a few thousand or it might have add-ons potentially worth millions. We just don’t know.