IndoMike
Very well known Exeweb poster
Hehe. He's catching more fish than an Icelandic trawler..Read the poster rather than the post in this case.
Hehe. He's catching more fish than an Icelandic trawler..Read the poster rather than the post in this case.
Who paid for it? We need to be careful as we don't want to be embroiled in Lollygate, as opposed to pizzagateAlex Russell was outside the Milkmaid earlier, having an ice cream lolly with Matty T.
Not at all convinced there's anything in the OP, notwithstanding that, much as I like Tom Nicholls as a player, pacey is one thing he most certainly ain't!No, still under contract so presumably would command a fee.
I think he’d be a very good signing and is the sort of player we’re packing up front. Has good movement, has a bit of pace plus can finish. He’s only 24 too so plenty of time left in his career.
I’m still sceptical if this is true though as you’d imagine Nichols would want to prove a point at Rovers after having a poor first season.
He might have a point to prove, but Rovers might not be in a mood to allow him to prove it. If Rovers want to offload him and he's available on the cheap, might be a good move for both parties. I'm all for not focusing on ex-players, but he was decent for us, left for a good fee and might be available to come back for peanuts. Jury'd be out on whether he could reproduce it, but I wouldn't be upset to see him given a shot.No, still under contract so presumably would command a fee.
I think he’d be a very good signing and is the sort of player we’re packing up front. Has good movement, has a bit of pace plus can finish. He’s only 24 too so plenty of time left in his career.
I’m still sceptical if this is true though as you’d imagine Nichols would want to prove a point at Rovers after having a poor first season.