Different Stuart James, I believe - well the profile pic on the Grauniad's website certainly ain't that of our Stuart.Proper journalism. I note Stuart James is one of the main footy reporters for The Guardian now, well deserved.
Different Stuart James, I believe - well the profile pic on the Grauniad's website certainly ain't that of our Stuart.Proper journalism. I note Stuart James is one of the main footy reporters for The Guardian now, well deserved.
It was indeed the Monday version Eggster and I do agree with you that it is decent value at 50p.Have you seen the new Monday edition? I only ask coz I've been a big critic of the Echo at times, but, IMO, it's 50p well spent.
It's nothing like Thursday's paper. Rather, it's bright, contemporary and extremely easy on the eye.
What's more, bringing this thread back on topic, player ratings have returned – mindful of the opening post, it might not seem a big thing. However, given they were, I believe, dropped at the behest of a former editor after prompting some disquiet in the corridors of power at SJP, it is at least a step in the direction many are advocating.
View attachment 646
I think you can follow it on facepalm or tw*tter and/or try www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/newsWould there be an on- line version for those of us not in the uk?
Larkins the Lurker B-)He might lurk Jeffers.
E&E have a lot more to lose than the Western Morning News if they were to pee off the club. The club block the E&E from getting any stories/comments from within the club, then that's their entire professional football section gone, along with all of the people who buy it for that reason. WMN on the other hand would still have our much less appealing, but still reasonably supported neighbours to report on. Can't really blame them for not wanting to take the risk personally.
That said, I would love to see some more media coverage on slightly uncomfortable questions directed at the club...
Who's Pete?Have to disagree with you Pete.