arthur
Very well known Exeweb poster
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2004
- Messages
- 11,754
Afternoon Al,So what should the Reverend Blair have done in 1997 art ? As you say he had immense political power with that majority.
Sorry not to have got back to you sooner - a lot on at the moment.
Big changes:
1. Fundamentally rebalance the economy, moving it away from low grade service jobs propped up by an over reliance on financial services/City of London towards a higher skilled, higher wage, future looking sustainable economy that can adapt and grow. This would have built in resilience and hope to communities where the old industrial order had withered away and no-one had thought about replacing it with anything remotely long term. The contrast between what happens in the Far East where they are constantly thinking about what comes next, and how they are going to get a piece of the action, and what they need to invest in in order to be in a position to realise opportunities, and our short term Anglo Saxon muddling through - we've always been OK, so we'll still be fine somehow - is startling.
2. Fundamentally reshape the way this country is run. David Blunkett observed, when he became an MP in 1987, that if he were in France or America and boss of a city the size and importance of Sheffield, he'd have far more influence than a back bench MP. But in Thatcher's Britain all power was increasingly concentrated at the centre. Labour did nothing to address this, if anything made it worse, and their attempts to devolve power through the RDAs just resulted in a lot more unelected, unaccountable bureaucracies with too much money and no attempt to measure the effectiveness of how they spent it. Real devolution of real power to city regions and other combinations of local authorities would have made a real difference to the social, political and economic landscape.
3. Replace our absurd electoral system with something more proportional. The Jenkins report had been written (reads better in the orginal Latin, as some wag put it) as well as others previously. Blair and Ashdown were all set to initiate change but Labour dinosaurs blocked it. Sort out the House of Lords and turn it into a proper second chamber. Move Parliament out of the museum into a modern building, fit for purpose...
Other shamefully neglected areas included housing. No significant building of homes for rent - no challenging of the orthodoxy that "ordinary decent people" are owner occupiers while renting is only for the young, poor and/or vulnerable. Where was the building of thriving mixed communities living in modern, well designed houses? Endless Barrett homes alongside housing association ghettos for poor people....
And the criminal justice system especially our appalling and useless prisons. As Ken Clarke put it in 2010 - "dear old John Reid and David Blunkett - cheque book in one hand and a copy of the Daily Mail in the other".
The problem was, of course, that New Labour was a machine for winning and its primary focus was on the media. (I rather like Cummings forbidding Ministers talking to the press, saying "they've got work to do".) If only New Labour had ignored the media and done some proper governing (Focus, Plan, Do, Review) instead of endless half baked gimmicks that had no lasting effect. Blair/Brown lacked any vision beyond retaining power, so 1945 it was not....