DaveE
Member
It's nice to read a reasoned post rather than 'He was b*ll*cks' 'You're b*ll*cks & don't know anything he was great' posts that sort of sum up this thread so far. For what it's worth, I agree with Sturtz.He shifted inside second half and was playing as our central striker. He tired and I thought that tisdale was relying on him pulling something out of the bag against his old club. We started pumping it up to him but he was beaten to the ball every time whereas Logie or mac would have had more chance of winning the ball and holding it up, giving our midfield and defence the chance to get forward.