- Admin
- #8,841
Possibly. A lot better than the Lynch version.5/10 Hants, Seems low?
Possibly. A lot better than the Lynch version.5/10 Hants, Seems low?
As I said before, I'm looking to the reviews on here before deciding to go see it, Don't normally but reading about the story a few film critics have said its possibly one of the most difficult books to put on film.Possibly. A lot better than the Lynch version.
That's what they said about Lord of the Rings. Anything is possible. Very much looking forward to Dune.As I said before, I'm looking to the reviews on here before deciding to go see it, Don't normally but reading about the story a few film critics have said its possibly one of the most difficult books to put on film.
Well the critics seem to like it judging by the 4/5 star reviews.That's what they said about Lord of the Rings. Anything is possible. Very much looking forward to Dune.
They said Trainspotting was an unfilmable book too, but Danny Boyle seemed to do OK.That's what they said about Lord of the Rings.
Only saw it once,on Video around 1990.A good film from what i remember.One of Connery’s better non Bond film roles.The Name of the Rose 1986. Sean Connery, F.Murray Abraham and Christian Slater.
A fourteenth century Franciscan monk and his novice assistant set out to solve a series of murders at a monastery peopled by a load of very odd monks , and on the way fall foul of the inquisition.From Umberto Eco’s book which it’s pretty faithful to , I read this when it first came out in the early eighties.Good film if you like the unusual.