DB9
Very well known Exeweb poster
Thing with Saddam and Iraq was that it was being contained, After the 1991 war his ability to rage war against another country was diminished to almost zero, Yes he ruled with a rod of iron but can we honestly say the place is much safer since he was deposed? Killings are an almost daily occurrence still and there is the Shia/Sunni devide. The point was we went to war with Iraq because we were told Iraq had WMD and could hit the UK within 45 mins which was a blatant lie and because Blair and Bush believed a report that was done by a student, They found nothing, left a vacuum there which gave rise to ISIS, I really wouldn't call that "Bending the rules a little"imho neither.
At the end of the day Saddam was a bad guy who needed to be gotten rid of. I know they couldn't just go in and do that and needed an excuse first, so I was ok with them bending the rules a little to achieve the goal.
I think what was more serious was Blair subsequently coming out saying - but that bloke Gadaffi, he's alright really. It undid everything that went before it re Iraq.