andrew p long
Very well known Exeweb poster
Yes, done on the back of a fag packet I suspect. The principle is one thing but unintended consequences are a real problem. The first was the incentive for potentially affected clubs to splash out before the vote - in signing players on expensive lengthy contracts and/ or extending existing contracts ( anything done after the proposals were made but before the outcome of the vote doesn’t count).
so predictably the first consequence of this cap is *increased* expenditure
so predictably the first consequence of this cap is *increased* expenditure