LammieLammieLammie
Very well known Exeweb poster
So you still think he's the worst City striker ever? :-ONo apologies from me - Stans' record does nothing to convince me I was wrong.
So you still think he's the worst City striker ever? :-ONo apologies from me - Stans' record does nothing to convince me I was wrong.
Oh for christ's sake - try reading posts THEN replying, not the other way round (that's assuming you can read).As you said on similar lines to me the other night mate, if Stanno scored 40 goals for the next two or three seasons he wouldn't convince Moxey.
Me too, i had him down for one goal on my post on the score prediction thread. Nice one stano[y]I would like to put this on record i never doubted stanno
Wouldn't disagree with either of those two statements, but as I said I just don't see an end product (from either him or his strike partner) regularly enough. Of course someone will trot out the 'if he was that good he wouldn't be playing for us' line, which to a fashion is true, but I want and expect more from him, and more consistently too.Ant, I guess that its the workrate that I value and appreciate so much from him.
Not all strikers are judged on the scoring record, I can think of plenty of really underrated strikers who were "players players" without getting plaudits from the terraces.