We used to call it kissball. <<snort snort>><<grunt>>Wendyball how amusing.
Bit thirsty, pass the aftershave
We used to call it kissball. <<snort snort>><<grunt>>Wendyball how amusing.
One thing's for sure, rugby fans haven't a clue how to sing: 'Chiefschiefschiefschiefschiefschiefs' has to be just about the most monotonous chant I've ever heard, that along with the laughable red indian wardance one. Where are the songs about the players or the opposition?i watched the highlights of them yesterday, give em credit they had an atmosphere
And those aren't even original.One thing's for sure, rugby fans haven't a clue how to sing: 'Chiefschiefschiefschiefschiefschiefs' has to be just about the most monotonous chant I've ever heard, that along with the laughable red indian wardance one. Where are the songs about the players or the opposition?
Poor effort Chiefs.
That was what they told me, but it's just like playing rugby while cellotaped up in sofa cushions, and you're allowed to throw forward. Easy innitIt's not, but that is another argument.
But the crowds are tiny and consist mainly of thick as f*ck, pie eating, Northern arse wipes, putting them all in nice new grounds won't make any difference.This is why I like Rugby League, it has a similar atmosphere to football, the fans are a good laugh and the chants and songs are alot more imaginative than just shouting the teams name over and over.
Saints crowd week before last was 14000, not very tiny IMOBut the crowds are tiny and consist mainly of thick as f*ck, pie eating, Northern arse wipes, putting them all in nice new grounds won't make any difference.