Danny Seaborne to Norwich?

[Northants Grecian]

who says the club hasnt offered him a new contract ?

Secondly it was only a week ago when there was a seaborne is the worst player in L1 thread ...

 

[STURTZ]

Quite surprised by this transfer development.

Personally can't see that much about Seaborne, I wait to be convinced that he's worth something.

 

[fred binneys head]

the lad is doing awesome.

Easy, tiger. He's had a few half-decent games but the jury is still out for most people - hardly "awesome", surely?

 

[007]

Easy, tiger. He's had a few half-decent games but the jury is still out for most people - hardly "awesome", surely?

At last a touch of common sense.

 

[Grecian1987]

So, apparently he was pretty bad today (I wasn't there - please correct me if I am wrong).

Really hope this won't mirror the beginning of last season.

 

[Grumpy Grecian]

Yes, can confirm he wasn't very good today, as if his mind was elsewhere?

GG

 

[Pete Martin (CTID)]

After seeing yesterday's performance I think there must have been a typographical mix-up somewhere.....it was actually NORTHwich that put in a bid....not NORwich.

 

[Kingsman]

If Tis thinks he is not good enough for his prefered position, now behind Troy and Edwards and was offered £100k, I would have accepted it.

 

[Bondy]

he was positioned really well for Huddersfield's third goal I thought....

 

[Wheres Tully?]

If Norwich feel Danny is suitable for their club then i would not be dissapointed to see him go, I would rather currently have Golbourne starting, looks much more comfortable on the ball when I've seen him and is quicker.Obviously its good that we've someone of noone's quality to attack, so perhaps tis sees seabourne as more adapt defensively. However he's hardley proved himself in the games he has started at LB......