grecian-near-hell
Well-known Exeweb poster
AndI think Harry Lee is only 19
AndI think Harry Lee is only 19
g-n-h was referring I think to Harry (Kite) being nearly 24I think Harry Lee is only 19
what makes you think they are out of favour?Get them signed up. Or at least make the offer. Would be great to work towards a homegrown spine of Lee, Diabete, Kite and Cox.
Unlikely given Kite and Lee being out of favour I know.
Hmmmmm I wonder?what makes you think they are out of favour?
therein may lie the reason why we have heard nothing about LeeI can see Cox signing on,I have a feeling Lee will be offski (hopefully not) and I think Cheick will sign get it sorted Gazza.
Not like I care but where's Gary Woods? is he injured apologies if blatantly obvious that he is.
My memory is that there was an assumption that Josh Key would be sold at the end of the promotion season but, in the end, that there were no suitable bids at that time.Indeed. Both will have seen what happened to Josh Key after he signed a 2.5 year contract with City. He had a stellar spell soon thereafter resulting in bids in successive transfer windows from (IIRC) Sunderland and Blackburn. City turned those offers down. And then Josh's form dropped off a bit (particularly when played out of position!). For a while it looked as if his chance of a big money move to a much bigger club might evaporate *because he'd signed a lengthy contract with ECFC*
I'm sure the agents for the best young City players will advise them against signing contracts that they tie them down for too long. They will want either shorter contracts than 3 years or a release clause.
Yesterday showed how important it is to have Chieck available and I hope he will sign along with Harry Lee. However, will Chieck want to be a bit part player at his age as Gary deffo sees Will as his number 1 CH.Hopefully we can build on the recent positive performances by making the most of the 2 week break to get a few more out-of-contract players to sign on the dotted line.