A few of my City mates are expressing the view that there was "known" unrest at management/board level in the past few weeks/months and as a result Tisfail's comittment to the play-off final was "questionable".
They are saying the starting 11, the tactics (hoof it to Stockley), the subs (James???, Edwards when all was lost) all point to this.
BTW you were no more carp at Wembley than we were against Wimbledon so not point scoring, just find it hard to believe that a manager would operate like this but one of your lot on Facebook (Phil Miller?) is saying SP before the match expressed "eloquently" what him and his mate thought of the club.
Couldn't be true, could it?
They are saying the starting 11, the tactics (hoof it to Stockley), the subs (James???, Edwards when all was lost) all point to this.
BTW you were no more carp at Wembley than we were against Wimbledon so not point scoring, just find it hard to believe that a manager would operate like this but one of your lot on Facebook (Phil Miller?) is saying SP before the match expressed "eloquently" what him and his mate thought of the club.
Couldn't be true, could it?