Red Monster
Active member
Sorry I take it all back Pete knows best.Have you not read #167
Sorry I take it all back Pete knows best.Have you not read #167
they had a few chances, more than City, but there weren't that many GLARING chances, few shots went wide, Ward made two or three decent saves. Nothing spectacular. In the main City's defenders stood firm. There was a section of the game around their penalty where City looked to be losing control of the midfield but manager made changes and after that it was more even. We certainly didnt get smashed up like their manager seems to think.I was unfortunately driving this afternoon and only just catching up now. I read that Flynn reckons they should have won as they were "by far the better team second half and Jamille Matt should have had a hatrick". Was this just the usual manager bull **** for his excuse or were we very lucky? Anyone see enough to say?
Thought that during the game. Would have helped a lot if he used his experience to keep control of the ball, because in the second half we just invited them on to us by not taking command.Just watched the sky highlights, there was a passage of play between 30 seconds and 40 seconds into the footage where Moxey made two mistakes, would Martin have been dropped for doing the same ?
Just thinking(without my Rothmans books or using 11 v 11) to keep my brain reasonably sharp on results.I can think of 2 defeats at SJP..A 0-2 loss when they returned to the FL & a 0-1 defeat when County were fighting from their FL survival in 16/17.In fact we've only lost three times to them since their return to the league and one of those was at home.
I looked at the 11v11 online.Just thinking(without my Rothmans books or using 11 v 11) to keep my brain reasonably sharp on results.I can think of 2 defeats at SJP..A 0-2 loss when they returned to the FL & a 0-1 defeat when County were fighting from their FL survival in 16/17.
Thanks for getting my memory kickstarted