The only way the 1931 would interest me is if the members had a say on the player signed (clearly never gonna happen). I just don't trust Tisdale enough to do the right thing and that is being shown again with Mcnish and Norwood.
Fair cop. Your money your choice after all.
I think it's blindingly obvious why we had a new pitch - making money isn't the sole purpose of the club's existence.
Hey Tone, excuse my ignorance but what was the reason? Please don't say to aid our 'good football', coz if so it hasn't been a great investment has it.
The best person to speak to is Clive the grounds man who had a battle on his hands with the pitch before it was re done, he was always patching it up all the time, this in itself was a drain on time and cash. We have yet to call off a game due to rain too ( :-#). The cost of calling off games is painful too. Money saved is money earned.
Well of course it was to aid our football - seriously, why else would we get a new pitch? As for how good an investment it's been, that will always be a moot point because we don't know how the current squad would have fared had we not had a new pitch - perhaps our results would have been worse - but I would suggest it's difficult to argue against having the old pitch replaced.
