LOG
Very well known Exeweb poster
He was the last man, it was a red.
Simples.
Simples.
IMO he was our best player at the time, then he made this stupid tackle and got sent off. There was a good chance with Duffy harassing him and Jones in goal they wouldn't have scored and we would have still had 11 on the pitch.Whilst it stopped a goal, going down to 10 men inevitably lead to them scoring.
It is naive in the extreme and will lead to an unnecessary suspension. With 11 men I thought there would only be one winner, even if they did score a second
Added to the fact that we still got a point and will hopefully have Matty T and/or Troy back for the game(s) Duffy is suspended for.He was the last man, it was a red.
Simples.
If we're all gonna get pedantic, here ("every other week") I'm gonna join in... He "implies", and from that I "infer"...Yes, I am a snooty barstewardYour inference on the matchday thread was overall and now to suggest you're just on about this season is not only a poor attempt to side step your own gaff but harsh in the extreme on Duffers. We've only played three games for God sake. If you'd come out with after we'd played double figures then you might just have a valid point.
In that case, maybe Wee Miss should play in our defense,..Agreed.We need someone who has "a bit of the night" about them.
:S.... What..? Taking both sides..?I don't approve of the use of the professional foul. But I was willing Duffy to pull him down and stop what probably would have been a goal.
I don't blame Duffy. A bit of cynicism will do us good.
3 match ban is for violent conduct.Having ten men for the second halfcould be a price worth paying - losing your best defender for three games is not.
Yes! It happens at times. Its a bit like I want us to win playing beautifully, by actually I want us to win, and don't care how we do it!:S.... What..? Taking both sides..?