lamrobhero
Active member
For me there are some questions that are too serious for Exeweb debate. I am afraid that this is one of them. Sorry.Interested to know why you say 'if it wasnt for the Falklands war' . Were you disappointed that we won?
For me there are some questions that are too serious for Exeweb debate. I am afraid that this is one of them. Sorry.Interested to know why you say 'if it wasnt for the Falklands war' . Were you disappointed that we won?
I was just interested to know why it was the Falklands war that prevented him(? Sorry shouldnt presume) stopped him voting for mrs Thatcher.I mean, that there is weapons grade, whilst we're on the subject of war.
Indeed Al. Feckin Dire! to coin a phrase.I listened to some of the questioning on the wireless this morning. Every time she started an answer with “So” I thought yes you are lying. Mr Beer KC was clearly unimpressed and an intervention from the Judge suggested he wasn’t buying it either. After the criticism in 2019 meted out to her by Mr Justice Fraser in the Bates litigation it beggars belief she carried on working for the Post Office for another year and then rocked up at Football Association of Wales.
How do these utterly useless individuals stay in well paid employment ?
She has probably pitched her replies to seek to avoid prosecution for contempt of court. In summary: “I missed the emails, I didn’t really understand what was going on, the technology was difficult to follow, others were involved. I am incompetent and useless.”
Ted's just getting ready.Gosh. Ms Van Den Boogerd getting even more thoroughly roasted this afternoon now the Postie's reps are getting their go.
Even though her replies are almost as tedious as those clichéd (almost) monosyllabic "No Comment" interviews so beloved by crime dramas. Although, in defence of the latter, at least those inserts usually last only a couple of minutes rather than two whole days.
Still, hopefully, just the aperitif before the Right Irreverent Vennals is dragged before the Altar of Public Enquiry next month. Perhaps they ought to draft in "Ted Hastings" for that show.
But to give her credit, the one thing that she certainly claim to have been was utterly bloody useless !Ms Van Den Boogerd was not a criminal investigator, was not a legal person in charge of bringing prosecutions and their conduct, was not a computer technical person and was not a senior manager repsonsible for the culture of the organisation.
I have only listened to part of her evidence but my impression is that there are others much more responsible. These others being more formally educated.But to give her credit, the one thing that she certainly claim to have been was utterly bloody useless !
I agree that there are almost certainly other people higher up the management chain who are far more culpableI have only listened to part of her evidence but my impression is that there are others much more responsible. These others being more formally educated.
There was an interesting witness earlier in the week who left the organisation after Directors were upset that she did not "control" the people she brought in to independently report on Horizon.