Jamie Mackie goes to QPR

[Poultice]

That, is what is called a WOOSH!

I believe claiming a whoosh against Greasy on a Jamie Mackie thread has be declared invalid, in any case I think it should be considered pretty poor form, a bit like taking the **** out of Argyle or kicking a puppy.

 

[STURTZ]

Always funny to read these threads and the poor saps that claimed he wasn't good enough in the conf. still trying to make themselves appear to know something. "I always knew he'd get found out" is a particular fave.

He's made it chums and when you're in a hole stop digging!

 

[pete_h]

Anyone know if we had any sell on clause when JM went to Argyle? Did City get any percentage of the sale to QPR?

 

[Poultice]

Anyone know if we had any sell on clause when JM went to Argyle? Did City get any percentage of the sale to QPR?

Yes, Steve Perryman did a blinding job on the deal and we got.............er, nothing.

 

[Jason H]

Anyone know if we had any sell on clause when JM went to Argyle? Did City get any percentage of the sale to QPR?

Wasn't he "released" to QPR?

 

[pete_h]

Wasn't he "released" to QPR?

There was mention a few pages back on the thread of QPR paying £400k for him.

 

[Jason H]

Oh, do carry on then.

 

[pete_h]

Yes, Steve Perryman did a blinding job on the deal and we got.............er, nothing.

Have you got a source for that?

 

[Poultice]

Have you got a source for that?

Yes, I have.

 

[pete_h]

Yes, I have.

...which is?