LOG
Very well known Exeweb poster
Started off really well but i think that was just because Oldham didn't get out of the blocks.
Bit down hill from there. It was the same old story with the strikers not looking anywhere near likely to score but then there wasn't much in the way of quality service. I thought that Dunne and Sercombe were playing a bit too deep, possibly to allow Harley to be a little more attacking and creative (which he wasn't). For all of their bombing down the wings, neither Tully nor Golbourne are capable of putting in consistently good crosses.
Harley shouldn't have taken the second penalty. Having the same person taking two puts too many doubts in their mind; should i put it in the same place or somewhere else? The more you have to think about taking a penalty, the more likely you are to make a mess of it. That said, i suppose if the keeper had gone the other way...
Really can't work out if Haber is any good. He always seems to be just a fraction behind the game but then will produce a nice little lay off.
Didn't think much of the substitutes. The wrong people brought on at the wrong times.
Finally, George didn't put a foot wrong all game.
In summary, nobody played badly, we just didn't play very well.
Bit down hill from there. It was the same old story with the strikers not looking anywhere near likely to score but then there wasn't much in the way of quality service. I thought that Dunne and Sercombe were playing a bit too deep, possibly to allow Harley to be a little more attacking and creative (which he wasn't). For all of their bombing down the wings, neither Tully nor Golbourne are capable of putting in consistently good crosses.
Harley shouldn't have taken the second penalty. Having the same person taking two puts too many doubts in their mind; should i put it in the same place or somewhere else? The more you have to think about taking a penalty, the more likely you are to make a mess of it. That said, i suppose if the keeper had gone the other way...
Really can't work out if Haber is any good. He always seems to be just a fraction behind the game but then will produce a nice little lay off.
Didn't think much of the substitutes. The wrong people brought on at the wrong times.
Finally, George didn't put a foot wrong all game.
In summary, nobody played badly, we just didn't play very well.
Last edited: