Flackmeister
Member
First let me say, credit to Tis for changing the formation on Saturday, the wing backs weren't working for us and the change brought about a better performance.
However, I think we could have taken all 3 points if we sorted out defending of set pieces (particularly corners). When Tis first arrived, one of the first things I noticed was that he left at least 1 player up when defending a corner, which was a welcome change from the tactics deployed by Inglethorpe & Dolan. I don't know why he has reverted to having everyone back in the box in the last couple years, but there are several problems with doing this:
a) It reduces the chance of a quick counter attack to practically zero.
b) If the ball is cleared, it goes straight back to the opposition causing wave after wave of attacks.
c) As we have all players not just in the 18 yard box, but within 12 yards of goad, if the ball is half cleared it will probably fall to an opponent lurking on the edge of the box for a free shot at goal.
d) Most importantly, the extra bodies aren't even working in terms of winning headers. On Saturday, York's big central defensive lump scored a free header whilst all 10 of our outfielders were just stood around deep in the box, then had a chance to win it with another free header.
All in all, I can't see any positives for this tactic and I think it is symptomatic of a negative mindset which has crept in in the last few seasons. I would like us to be a bit bolder in general, and particularly when defending set plays.
However, I think we could have taken all 3 points if we sorted out defending of set pieces (particularly corners). When Tis first arrived, one of the first things I noticed was that he left at least 1 player up when defending a corner, which was a welcome change from the tactics deployed by Inglethorpe & Dolan. I don't know why he has reverted to having everyone back in the box in the last couple years, but there are several problems with doing this:
a) It reduces the chance of a quick counter attack to practically zero.
b) If the ball is cleared, it goes straight back to the opposition causing wave after wave of attacks.
c) As we have all players not just in the 18 yard box, but within 12 yards of goad, if the ball is half cleared it will probably fall to an opponent lurking on the edge of the box for a free shot at goal.
d) Most importantly, the extra bodies aren't even working in terms of winning headers. On Saturday, York's big central defensive lump scored a free header whilst all 10 of our outfielders were just stood around deep in the box, then had a chance to win it with another free header.
All in all, I can't see any positives for this tactic and I think it is symptomatic of a negative mindset which has crept in in the last few seasons. I would like us to be a bit bolder in general, and particularly when defending set plays.