Artur's penalty save

[citizen33]

As a former member of the G/K's union I'd say it was a good save, but not as good as some of the early reports suggested (high to the keeper's left etc). If truth be told, it was a weak penalty placed too close to the keeper and at a nice height: Artur's problem was more the risk that he would go too far as opposed to not reaching the ball. Still a penalty save is a penalty save, and one can't knock success.

 

[Grecian2K]

Rather surprised that Pate hasn't had the good grace to retract his earlier (and now provenly incorrect) assumption - even if its only to replace it with a new one asserting with equal arrogance that Artur was now, in fact, two yards BEHIND the line when he saved it, and hence the goal should have been given.

 

[Lager Lout]

In Pete's defense, Artur may have saved a penalty, kept a clean sheet, gathered his crosses, instilled confidence in the back four and generally not put a foot wrong, but what else did he do?

LL

 

[lmartin]

^ Another case in favour of the ability to 'Like' posts on Exeweb.