• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

VAR - In our league: Yay or Nay?

Spoonz Red E

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
12,445
Location
Comfortably mid-table
Sadly, despite the escalating development of the 'internet of things', there will be no AI jumpers for goalposts in my lifetime.
 

Oldsmobile-88

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
27,107
Location
In RaWZ we trust....Amen.
No from me...But I feel it’s inevitable that it will be introduced for live games in the PL within the next 5 years.
 

Grecian2K

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
33,019
Location
Busy knitting muesli
Surely we are already blessed with VAR.

Virtuous Arizonan Referee.
 

Pete Martin (CTID)

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
11,403
Location
Here and there
We've managed perfectly well at SJP for 110 years without VAR. Yes sometimes a referee's decision is wrong, but sometimes shyt happens. Just live with it.
 

IndoMike

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
34,044
Location
Touring Central Java...
More than once the ref's initial/instinctive decision was correct and more than once using VAR the eventual decision was wrong. in addition. the joy ofa goal being scored is diminished both for players and fans since there is a possible wait in case VAR comes into play. In the end we'll have nothing to talk about if there is no controversy.
Finally, the cost of using the relevant equipment and paying for the monitors will be too excessive for lower league clubs. So, for me it's a NAY.
 
Last edited:

Steve H

Active member
Joined
May 26, 2004
Messages
1,519
Location
Exeter
Please no...... Along with assistant referees behind the goal line this is one 'improvement' we can happily do without
 

jrg333

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
423
It's a nay from me too. The footballing and refereeing community is still not agreed on what constitutes a 'handball' or a 'dive' in many instances, so simply increasing the number of camera angles is nowt but a waste of time and a drain on the atmosphere in the stadium.

VAR for objective goal-line, touch-line, and by-line decisions is fine. Possibly offsides too although I think linos do a great job in general. For any other decisions VAR does nothing but add a few minutes of boredom to the game.
 

citydrinker

Active member
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
3,705
Location
2 minute hobble from the nearest pub. Or in it.
At any level lower than Premiership it's a nay from me. The only possible exceptions could be for Play-Offs and Cup finals.
 

Jason H

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
36,850
Location
Hounslow, Middlesex
No, no and no again. While on occasion VAR at the World Cup managed to turn a wrong decision right, it also managed to turn right decisions wrong as using slow motion makes an incident look different to the actual intent at the time. Running the penalty incident in real time yesterday would show that at no point did the defender intend to put hand to ball as the France player's jump blocked off his view meaning he had practically no reaction time. Rather than "solving" the debate it only seems to have intensified it.

The practical reason is around the number of officials required vs the number of available officials and the knock-on effects. By introducing a "5th" official at professional levels you're reduced to increasing the supply of available officials, from which you will need to source from below. This has the effect firstly of diluting the quality of officials at lower levels through over-promotion and then secondly creating shortages further down where officials are already in short supply. Grassroots matches will therefore suffer through not having enough officials (something that happens anyway).
 

IndoMike

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
34,044
Location
Touring Central Java...
No, no and no again. While on occasion VAR at the World Cup managed to turn a wrong decision right, it also managed to turn right decisions wrong as using slow motion makes an incident look different to the actual intent at the time. Running the penalty incident in real time yesterday would show that at no point did the defender intend to put hand to ball as the France player's jump blocked off his view meaning he had practically no reaction time. Rather than "solving" the debate it only seems to have intensified it.

The practical reason is around the number of officials required vs the number of available officials and the knock-on effects. By introducing a "5th" official at professional levels you're reduced to increasing the supply of available officials, from which you will need to source from below. This has the effect firstly of diluting the quality of officials at lower levels through over-promotion and then secondly creating shortages further down where officials are already in short supply. Grassroots matches will therefore suffer through not having enough officials (something that happens anyway).
Totally agree with your very good point in the first para about slow motion distorting the reality of the action and totally agree there was no hand to ball. It might have cost Croatia the World Cup.
 
Top