IndoMike
Very well known Exeweb poster
And I followed on with the Notts Forest thingy.I'll break this up. Kane plays for West Brom. Not Forest. (unless I missed something)
Kane is WBA
Richardson is Forest
Williams is Watford
(I think)
And I followed on with the Notts Forest thingy.I'll break this up. Kane plays for West Brom. Not Forest. (unless I missed something)
I’m not sure with what’s going on withSo what would Kane's value be as part of your deal with Forest?
So we would have to pay Watford 400 kI’m not sure with what’s going on with
football playing in front of empty stadium’s ,clubs outside
the Premier League will risk throwing cash around.
If say Forest did offer 800k plus Richardson who say for argument
is valued at 100k I would prefer that to another club offering
a million.
Saying all that they might think Richardson is going to
be in there plans as he looks a good prospect.
Sorry pal. My error. I got mixed up with Kane and Richardson. Now it's all cleared upI’m not sure with what’s going on with
football playing in front of empty stadium’s ,clubs outside
the Premier League will risk throwing cash around.
If say Forest did offer 800k plus Richardson who say for argument
is valued at 100k I would prefer that to another club offering
a million.
Saying all that they might think Richardson is going to
be in there plans as he looks a good prospect.
Williams is ECFC. Watford just want a slice of something if we sell him.And I followed on with the Notts Forest thingy.
Kane is WBA
Richardson is Forest
Williams is Watford
(I think)
Mike I think we would still make 400k profit as RichardsonSo we would have to pay Watford 400 k
(50% of 800k) + pay 100k for Richardson =
500k.
Profit for selling Williams would be
300k + Richardson.
I think they have to be specific about player value Red.Mike I think we would still make 400k profit as Richardson
is part of the deal ,or they could simply say he was a free .