Egg
Well-known Exeweb poster
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2004
- Messages
- 9,694
His testimony, provided under oath, was evidence; what's he's yet to provide is proof to support that evidence.Cummings fails to provide the select committee with the evidence to back up his Hancock allegations.
And while I appreciate where you're coming from, witnesses at a trial aren't obliged to provide proof before their testimony is given any credence.
As I see it, Cummings is yet to provide any proof and, thus far today, Hancock seems to have a very convenient memory lapse when he's asked to explain how lots of critical decisions were arrived at.