IndoMike
Very well known Exeweb poster
How much have we actually received for Ampadu so far? Probably it's been mentioned but I forget.
That sounds about right. Not sure where else to look for his total appearances though?Presumably their stat is only league appearances? He has made one of those (against Huddersfield last season).
So it does. Cheers JasonSoccerbase should have it?
Soccer Base has one PL appearance as a sub, 3 FA Cup and 3 League Cup appearances, 2 starts in each. Total 7 first team.That sounds about right. Not sure where else to look for his total appearances though?
That is the correct figure and the one on which appearance related add ons is based.Soccer Base has one PL appearance as a sub, 3 FA Cup and 3 League Cup appearances, 2 starts in each. Total 7 first team.
Thanks, Andrew. Peanuts, isn't it? Crumbs from the tableThat is the correct figure and the one on which appearance related add ons is based.
In answer to Mike we have become entitled to £1.3m so far. It is irritating that so many reports say the fee was set at £2.5m by the Tribunal. We only get to 2.5m when Ethan has played in 50 competitive first team matches; at current rates that could be a long time coming..
True but did the Tribunal set an overall maximum. If so I would have thought they exceeded their remit. Surely the more games that Amps plays the more it would show his worth. Although playing devil’s advocate I guess Chelsea would argue that such further progress would be down to the efforts of their own coaches.That is the correct figure and the one on which appearance related add ons is based.
In answer to Mike we have become entitled to £1.3m so far. It is irritating that so many reports say the fee was set at £2.5m by the Tribunal. We only get to 2.5m when Ethan has played in 50 competitive first team matches; at current rates that could be a long time coming..
Yes there is a maximum no of games which is where the £2.5m maximum comes in. The only variable is the 20% sell on fee. which is in addition to the fees accrued, ie if they sold him now we would be left with the £1.3M already received plus 20% of their profit. So if they sold him for £1.5M it would be £40k, or if for £21.3M it would £4M ! At least that's how I think it works ! (boffin)True but did the Tribunal set an overall maximum. If so I would have thought they exceeded their remit. Surely the more games that Amps plays the more it would show his worth. Although playing devil’s advocate I guess Chelsea would argue that such further progress would be down to the efforts of their own coaches.