IndoMike
Very well known Exeweb poster
Kenny Sansom?He's just got Sansomitus at the moment and will return to former glories once he grows his hair back.
Kenny Sansom?He's just got Sansomitus at the moment and will return to former glories once he grows his hair back.
I'm not sure that the "Rule of Thirds" is still in effect; AFAIK the Club have not said this is the case in the commentary about the Cliff Hill delays, the capital cost of which is now £3M.That's fake news to an extent. All the transfer income gets divided three ways. One third goes towards the playing budget, spread over three years. In his time here MT has always had enhanced budgets. It might not have put us right at the top of the pile of League Two budgets, but it was certainly more than Tisdale had in 2016 or 2017.
No doubt we're near the bottom of League One budgets but MT would have known the budget wouldn't increase further without another sale this summer.
The Old Grandstand needed to be replaced before it fell down and likewise the portacabin at the Cliff Hill. I have no doubt that in future a bigger percentage of transfer income could be directed to the playing budget because once The Cliff Hill has been paid for I don't think we have many pressing infrastructure projects.
Wasn't there also money from Villa / Brentford for Villa staying up (Watkins)?I'm not sure that the "Rule of Thirds" is still in effect; AFAIK the Club have not said this is the case in the commentary about the Cliff Hill delays, the capital cost of which is now £3M.
Work set to begin on new facilities at training ground - News - Exeter City FC
As I have commented on other threads, we are getting a large increase (50% more) in money from the PL and TV cascade now we are in L1, and also more from higher attendances and ticket prices, but it's not clear where they are applying this. They have been much less open about the finances in the last few years than previously.
I was only questioning your point about Dieng, not the game in general. You seem to have inferred I was talking about you and toys being thrown, which I wasn't. So it is you who has read what they wanted to read.I do think people read what they want to read. I said:
"We were much the better side first half and deserved the lead. Great game really, end to end, I enjoyed it and ultimately could have gone either way."
------
MT himself commented on the lack of quality off the bench and said we looked worse with them on. He knows we need more quality and is also aware that we have had a straight forward start in terms of fixtures. No toys are being thrown. All I said was Jevani goes and we are substantially worse - there is a real chance of this happening IMO. Yes we'd get money but given that our training ground was an extra 800k and we have signed the least amount of players in the EFL I don't particularly trust he'd be replaced adequately right now. We await next week as MT has stated (again) that signings will happen before Saturday.
RE: Dieng, yes I think he was laboured yesterday and our worst player on the pitch. I don't think his game suits League 1 as much and will be benched for most of this season when Taylor gets that midfielder he wants. Doesn't mean I don't like him or think he has value, I do - but in a different way to last season (where he often came off as he struggles with 90 anyway in L2).
With regards to MT's comments about the subs, I read the sub context of that as a cry to the board that we need more reinforcements. Although It also seems to be a knock on Jay, who should be affecting these types of games more as a substitute.I do think people read what they want to read. I said:
"We were much the better side first half and deserved the lead. Great game really, end to end, I enjoyed it and ultimately could have gone either way."
------
MT himself commented on the lack of quality off the bench and said we looked worse with them on. He knows we need more quality and is also aware that we have had a straight forward start in terms of fixtures. No toys are being thrown. All I said was Jevani goes and we are substantially worse - there is a real chance of this happening IMO. Yes we'd get money but given that our training ground was an extra 800k and we have signed the least amount of players in the EFL I don't particularly trust he'd be replaced adequately right now. We await next week as MT has stated (again) that signings will happen before Saturday.
RE: Dieng, yes I think he was laboured yesterday and our worst player on the pitch. I don't think his game suits League 1 as much and will be benched for most of this season when Taylor gets that midfielder he wants. Doesn't mean I don't like him or think he has value, I do - but in a different way to last season (where he often came off as he struggles with 90 anyway in L2).
He's implied on more than one occasion. that he is a bit frustrated with the current situation and has discreetly pointed his finger in the direction of the money-keepersWith regards to MT's comments about the subs, I read the sub context of that as a cry to the board that we need more reinforcements. Although It also seems to be a knock on Jay, who should be affecting these types of games more as a substitute.
You just invented that mikeHe's implied on more than one occasion. that he is a bit frustrated with the current situation and has discreetly pointed his finger in the direction of the money-keepers
Don't panic!Not the worst result but does confirm to me that we need a left back who enjoys defending. You can't have a slow, converted winger rotating with a slow, converted centre back at wing back after a promotion. Sparkes might be the best ball striker in our squad but players like Coppinger, who plied his trade in L1 for years, would terrorise him. He just doesn't seem to enjoy the less glamourous aspects of being a wing back to me. Likewise Hartridge doesn't enjoy hugging the touchline enough to give us width as a wing back. I bet we have missed a few targets in this position this summer.
In before some old sod with 40,000+ posts accuses me of panicking...