FiddlersCat
New member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 38
We were really, really, really awful at Bury this season.We were really really awful last season at Bury.
Last edited:
We were really, really, really awful at Bury this season.We were really really awful last season at Bury.
We're really, really awful at Bury most seasons. Have a look at the history books. The results will prove we've barely had any success in nigh on 90 years up there.We were really, really, really awful at Bury this season.
Eh ?We Sell our quality players but is the wonga being spent in the correct way.
I dont blame Paul,
Why does blame have to be apportioned? Perhaps we were lucky last year and just don't have the resources (which essentially is what long term success come down to) to be at that level without a lot of luck and the best the can hope for is a relegation battle as in our first year.If blame is being apportioned then in amy company the buck must always stop with the board.
This isn't a 'get at the board' thing, it just goes with the territory when you are a director.
Finally the penny drops with Dimmers although I have no clue what the rest of his post was all about, the Cheese has been dog lucky, I would like to agree with Hatchy on blaming the Board but see us as being a bit different from the norm. Most boards in most football clubs reflect the ownerage, the majority shareholder being the MD or CEO or Chairman, usually the latter, we have uninvested Suits as directors and Man Utd supporting ex pen pusher as a Chairman.Why does blame have to be apportioned? Perhaps we were lucky last year and just don't have the resources (which essentially is what long term success come down to) to be at that level without a lot of luck and the best the can hope for is a relegation battle as in our first year.