We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here
Or The Allardyce Principle as it is known. If you assess that your players are not bright enough or skilled enough to do what they’ve been asked, resort to a glorified form of kick and rush.
Surely it’s more ‘effective’ than having *less* possession and not scoring a goal? Is effectiveness only about results? Is possession an end in itself? Why are lions? 😄
If you buy an iFollow pass for an ECFC away match, my understanding is that the home club keep the cash. Which is AH’s issue.
(But maybe I am very confused)
This feels like a weirdly negative take. As we know, our model depends on transfer income, and as Rosencrantz says, if we for whatever reason didn’t make these sales we would cut our cloth accordingly. And you say yourself that the next financial year will already show transfer income a million...
These accounts look pretty good. 95% of clubs would kill for figures like these - we are solvent, profitable and sustainable. And kudos to the club for publishing the full accounts - have we done this before??
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.