Search results

That does already exist, the International Bill of Human Rights, passed by the UN in 1976. Albeit not legally binding.

No, I wasn't wrong. Had I immediately accused you of homophobia I'd have been wrong. I didn't know, because the post wasn't clear to me. Therefore I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

It wasn't clear to me, but, as I said, I gave the benefit of the doubt.

In fairness, on first reading I thought you were referring to homosexuals when you said "these people". After reading it again I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

If only. In fairness to his kingliness, the profits from the crown estates are paid to the treasury, of which a portion is paid back as his pocket money.

No, the crown owns around 30 properties, including Balmoral, Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, Sandringham, Holyrood etc.

I think what our colleague meant to imply is that the bulk of currently practiced religions originated there.

On topic, just imagine how much more value for money the royal family would be if this money was going to the public, and not being trousered by Charlie and co?

All we really seem to have got so far is "this group of ethnically diverse people whose religion started the Middle East are a race, but this group of ethnically diverse people whose religion started in the Middle East are not a race, because Nazis. And also, if a Jewish person says otherwise...

They always will be to me. RIP Paul.

Is your argument seriously "well the Nazis thought they were a race, who am I to disagree with that"?

Apparently in Mein Kampf.

I think it's pretty obvious he means the Nazis wouldn't have made a distinction. But if for some reason you're using Nazi beliefs to justify your own, perhaps we should be worrying about you?

Here you go Tavy, a link from the aptly named "My Jewish Learning" website https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/are-jews-a-race/

You know what else sold out in seconds? S Club 7. Perhaps we should give them millions of taxpayers' cash, as they're clearly worth their weight in gold.

Apologies, but you made an assertion about trans activists that I don't believe to be true. Whilst there are legitimate concerns with the Scottish law, I don't think it's fair to package that with a statement that is so far not supported by the evidence. FYI, I have no doubt there are...

Again, no actual quotes backing up the assertion. The closest is the quote from Nancy Kelley, although I note that the Guardian article edits out the somewhat pertinent "Nobody should ever be pressured into dating, or pressured into dating people they aren't attracted to."

And yet the fact remains that if trans activists have been saying this, then it ought to be fairly easy to provide evidence of it, surely?

If they can't supply evidence for the claims they are making then I've no choice but to mistrust their motives.