• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Genuine question for Matt Taylor

arthur

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
11,711
You and Danny Seaborne were very effective as a centre back partnership. Why do we now need three men to the job the two of you did?
 
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
687
Not sure he's reading this at 16.50 on a Saturday afternoon. Perhaps if you asked Danny Seaborne you may get a quicker response.
 

LDNGrecian

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2017
Messages
626
Location
London
Especially after a 2-0 win!
 

arthur

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
11,711
Not sure he's reading this at 16.50 on a Saturday afternoon. Perhaps if you asked Danny Seaborne you may get a quicker response.
I know MT spends his Sunday mornings perusing Exeweb in order to understand where he's gone wrong and what he needs to do to put things right, so I'm quite happy to wait until then...
 

jrg333

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
423
You and Danny Seaborne were very effective as a centre back partnership. Why do we now need three men to the job the two of you did?
Look at how much more of an attacking threat Josh Key and Jake Caprice have been this season than, say, Craig Woodman and Scott Hiley would have been in a typical back 4. Three at the back allows mobile wing backs to contribute a lot more to the game than two traditional full backs can.
 

arthur

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
11,711
Look at how much more of an attacking threat Josh Key and Jake Caprice have been this season than, say, Craig Woodman and Scott Hiley would have been in a typical back 4. Three at the back allows mobile wing backs to contribute a lot more to the game than two traditional full backs can.
We shall have to agree to differ. You may remember that we played with a back four last season and created more attacking threat than most of us have seen in the last twenty years
 

Pobbop

Active member
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
3,645
Location
Exeter
I don't think he'll be changing his defensive line-up, considering the start we've got off too, nor should he.
 

SEA Grecian

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Oct 14, 2018
Messages
6,153
We shall have to agree to differ. You may remember that we played with a back four last season and created more attacking threat than most of us have seen in the last twenty years
But only for the first half of the season.

Most teams we've played against this season have also played three at the back and we've matched up well against them. What was great today was the players had the flexibility to adapt mid-match to four at the back to counter a team who were having success against us by playing with four at the back themselves.
 

Pobbop

Active member
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
3,645
Location
Exeter
But only for the first half of the season.

Most teams we've played against this season have also played three at the back and we've matched up well against them. What was great today was the players had the flexibility to adapt mid-match to four at the back to counter a team who were having success against us by playing with four at the back themselves.
Yeah, in the end I would agree with Arthur's argument if last season didn't finish as the dampest of Squibs, when it mattered.
 

Grecian Max

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
17,705
Location
Exeter
Five clean sheets.

Every game is different, but we have been very threatening in a number of games this season, think there’s more to come too.
 
Top