Exeter v Barrow - Discussion

[Legohead]

It's not being negative you person. It makes us look like clowns that we only need to turn up to beat Barrow.

Is it only forum owners who get to call a poster 'person' without earning infraction pointage? Just wondering like.

I just hope it makes Hants feel a little better about himself. Happy to be of service and to ignore online bullying if so. Anything to help.

Maybe Exeweb should be joining in with the football social media boycott against bullying and abuse?

 

[tonykellowfan]

Starting line up:-

Andreson

Sweeney
McArdle
Page


Collins
Taylor

Williams
Fisher
Seymour
Bowman
Sparkes

If we lose, we certainly tried.

So Sermour, Bowman and Fisher up front but no Jay. OK then.

 

[andrew p long]

Please,please, please can we change the thread title. It looks so disrespectful,complacent and arrogant. Just the sort of thing that the opposition manager would pin up in the changing room. And it doesn't reflect Lego's considered view as expressed in post 57 on page 6.

 

[Legohead]

Please,please, please can we change the thread title. It looks so disrespectful,complacent and arrogant. Just the sort of thing that the opposition manager would pin up in the changing room. And it doesn't reflect Lego's considered view as expressed on page 6.

Yes please do change the thread title as it appears to have caused so much consternation despite it being no more than a flippant bit of positive fun and not intended to be disrespectful to our opponents.

Although the thread title, even if it said 'we're going to smash Barrow 20 nil' would still have no actual bearing on the outcome of the match, best change it just incase.

Sod positivity. Barrow will walk this as we're dogsh*t. That's better.

BTW, it is only the discussion thread though, not the MTD obvs.

 

[Colesman Ballz]

Please,please, please can we change the thread title. It looks so disrespectful,complacent and arrogant. Just the sort of thing that the opposition manager would pin up in the changing room. And it doesn't reflect Lego's considered view as expressed in post 57 on page 6.

Agreed, definitely needs changing !

 

[Snakebite]

Is it only forum owners who get to call a poster 'person' without earning infraction pointage? Just wondering like.

Imagine if one of us had called Hants that. The ban hammer would have been out quicker than you could write ‘fuc...’

 

[Squeezebox]

Agreed, definitely needs changing !

"definately" surely!!

 

[geoffwp]

"definately" surely!!

Nope. CB is correct.

 

[grecIAN Harris]

Please,please, please can we change the thread title. It looks so disrespectful,complacent and arrogant. Just the sort of thing that the opposition manager would pin up in the changing room. And it doesn't reflect Lego's considered view as expressed in post 57 on page 6.

Do take it with the pinch of salt that it was intended with and stop being such a snowflake.

 

[STURTZ]

Maybe the tiitle was a subtle use of sarcasm........let the psychological war commence!

Wonder if Barrow will travel down the day before? After all, the game doesn't really mean anything to their end of season. If they do come down on friday I'd like to be the first to offer them the chance of a **** uip at The Imperial.