• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Tisdale:- Artur to blame for our loss at Bury?

wemissmoxey

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
11,793
Location
Cheesedale PLC, Cotswolds.
Oh dear. You're hilarious. All 'keepers make errors. Krysiak has made very few this season. He plays behind a quiet and slow defence. I would be surprised if he didn't find a League One club willing to take him on in the next 12 months.
Indeed, I'd far rather have Artur between the sticks for us than most other keepers at our level.

With regards to goalkeeping errors, we have been fortunate with a few recently, the Dagenham keeper chucked one in late on to hand us a point which could prove crucial, the Fleetwood keeper also gifted us a goal, both of these happened recently.

Artur is the least of our problems.

No wonder this 007 chap is fond of Tisdale.
 
Last edited:

paperclip

Active member
Joined
Nov 1, 2006
Messages
1,765
Indeed, I'd far rather have Artur between the sticks for us than most other keepers at our level.

With regards to goalkeeping errors, we have been fortunate with a few recently, the Dagenham keeper chucked one in late on to hand us a point which could prove crucial, the Fleetwood keeper also gifted us a goal, both of these happened recently.

Artur is the least of our problems.
Agreed. The lack of shots on target in recent games is a much greater concern.
 

007

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
9,956
Location
lost
Artur has been one of the better performers this season, and lets face it you cant compare Hamer to Artur, Hamer went on to play Championship football, i think Artur is one of the best keepers in this league, the problems lie in the fact we dont SCORE GOALS so if we let one in we lose

GET OFF ARTURS BACK!!!!!!!
He deserves it he's cost us dearly in the last 3 seasons
even when we were getting shots on target and scoring goals a k was busy consistently fucin up and a major reason we got into the play offs was that we dropped artur and got Hamer in. and exactly why cant we compare hamer and artur, when we got them, artur was 3rd or 4 th @ birmingham and hamer was the same @ Reading same same.
 

007

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
9,956
Location
lost
No wonder this 007 chap is fond of Tisdale.

ITs not a case of being 'fond of pt', its just the arguments that are put forward in criticism of pt are at best inept, the only one thats put 2 gether a decent FOOTBALL case was the manc the rest ,frankly has been emotional and frankly bollacks
 

East Devon Clown

Active member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,475
Location
Putting the fun and the mental back into fundament
I know I've ribbed Artur a bit in the past over certain situations where he's conceded a goal,
Yes, Pete, you have ribbed him a bit in the past. Never anything more than that. (facepalm)
 

John William

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
9,915
Location
Undisclosed
He deserves it he's cost us dearly in the last 3 seasons
even when we were getting shots on target and scoring goals a k was busy consistently fucin up and a major reason we got into the play offs was that we dropped artur and got Hamer in. and exactly why cant we compare hamer and artur, when we got them, artur was 3rd or 4 th @ birmingham and hamer was the same @ Reading same same.
Not so. I suggest you check your facts before posting this rubbish. We were only briefly in the playoffs in 2010-11, matches 10 and 12. Hamer played 18 games for us, most of that time we were mid-table. It was only in the last 8 games we made a surge, and we got to 8th only in the last two games when it was already too late - and Artur played in those two games.
 
Last edited:

007

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
9,956
Location
lost
Not so. I suggest you check your facts before posting this rubbish. We were only briefly in the playoffs in 2010-11, matches 10 and 12. Hamer played 18 games for us, most of that time we were mid-table. It was only in the last 8 games we made a surge, and we got to 8th only in the last two games when it was already too late - and Artur played in those two games.
you what?
we were in mid table and struggling when hamer came in and replaced artur, artur was f u cin up on a regular basis and we looked like we would PROBABLY be dropping towards the relegation zone AGAIN, Hamer helped to stop that, defo stabilized the defense and we narrowly missed the play offs despite a k playing the majority of the games early doors not because
 
Last edited:

John William

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
9,915
Location
Undisclosed
you what?
we were in mid table and struggling when hamer came in and replaced artur, artur was f u cin up on a regular basis and we looked like we would PROBABLY be dropping towards the relegation zone AGAIN, Hamer helped to stop that, defo stabilized the defense and we narrowly missed the play offs despite a k playing the majority of the games early doors not because
We were 14th when Hamer joined, having had an up-and-down season up to then, and stayed around that level until the end of March when we were 12th. We then went on an 8-game run to the end of the season, and as I said before Artur played in two of those games.

And we did NOT narrowly miss the playoffs. We were never in the hunt, it was already too late when we began our run.

Hamer is a better keeper than Artur, no doubt about it, but your seem obsessed with doing Krysiack down at every possible opportunity. A bit of balance, please.
 
Last edited:

motorservices

Active member
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
4,075
Location
Feeling wonderful
you what?
we were in mid table and struggling when hamer came in and replaced artur, artur was f u cin up on a regular basis and we looked like we would PROBABLY be dropping towards the relegation zone AGAIN, Hamer helped to stop that, defo stabilized the defense and we narrowly missed the play offs despite a k playing the majority of the games early doors not because
take it you didnt go to uddersfield then??? anyway, this is 3 years ago, Artur is a completely different player now

007 you are a complete ****, if we were getting smashed each week fine yes blame the keeper, FACT IS we arent and havent been smashed all season, so if the shots are going in then we have a chance to win, if we dont have a shot on target we dont, SIMPLE as that

Its people like you that keep Tisdale in his JOB!!!!!!!!!!!
 

manc grecian

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
22,247
Location
following through
Right just to settle this.... The lack of imagination, creativity, speed call it what you will puts a great deal of pressure on our goalkeeper. He knows if he makes a mistake it's likely to cost us the game because the manager hasn't got a scooby doo in how to put a team out that creates enough chances.

Arthur has worked hard to eradicate mistakes from his game but they will still happen, they shouldn't burden him with costing the game every time.
 
Top